The European Union has intensified its economic pressure on Moscow by approving its 17th package of restrictive measures, targeting Moscow’s critical revenue streams and signalling readiness for further action if a 30-day ceasefire is not honoured. Adopted at an EU ambassadors’ meeting on May 14, 2025, the measures impose sweeping restrictions on shipping, defence, dual-use goods, and strategic chemicals—elements central to Russia’s war effort. This decisive move, which follows sixteen previous rounds of sanctions since February 2022, underscores Brussels’ determination to force Russian President Vladimir Putin to accept an unconditional halt to hostilities on land, air, and sea.
Table of Contents
Targeting the shadow fleet to choke war funding
At the heart of the new sanctions is an expansion of maritime measures against the so-called “shadow fleet”—a covert armada of aged, uninspected tankers employed to evade Western oil-trade restrictions. Previously, 153 vessels had been blacklisted and denied access to EU ports and services; the 17th package adds 189 more, bringing the total to just over 350 tankers effectively barred from European waters and insurance markets. These ships have been implicated in falsifying navigational data, disabling transponders to slip past authorities, and conducting clandestine ship-to-ship transfers aimed at obscuring the origin of crude oil barrels. By shutting down these routes, the EU seeks to deprive Moscow of vital export revenues that bankroll its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Beyond shipping, the package freezes assets and curbs trade in chemicals that can be repurposed for missile production. Brussels has also blacklisted 75 individuals and entities within Russia’s military-industrial complex alongside more than 30 international firms—spanning Kazakhstan, Serbia, Turkey, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, and the UAE—suspected of supplying dual-use technologies banned under existing EU regulations. The convergence of shipping and industrial restrictions marks a calibrated effort to degrade Russia’s war-making capacity without fracturing the EU’s fragile consensus on deeper sanctions targets such as energy and finance.
Political hurdles and unity among EU members
Securing unanimity across 27 member states has repeatedly tested the EU’s resolve. Hungary, in particular, has emerged as the bloc’s most vocal sceptic of economic restrictions, twice threatening to block renewals of the sanctions regime earlier this year. Yet in a display of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, Budapest refrained from opposing the 17th package—suggesting that its scope, which spares core energy supplies, was deemed acceptable even by reluctant capitals.
“There is no appetite at all at European level for this sort of sanctions beyond a basic package,” one EU diplomat acknowledged, warning that grandiose ultimatums risked undermining Brussels’ credibility if not backed by deliverable measures. Still, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated the bloc’s willingness to target Russia’s energy and financial markets should Moscow continue to stonewall diplomatic overtures. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot confirmed that the Commission had been tasked with drafting proposals to extend punitive measures into these sectors, though any such moves will require even greater political alignment and may hinge on parallel action from Washington to convince Hungary to relent on future votes.
Pressure for deeper measures amid stalled diplomacy
The urgency of the sanctions push has been amplified by a lack of progress on the diplomatic front. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly challenged President Putin to embrace direct face-to-face negotiations—first proposed for Istanbul on May 15—under the auspices of a “Coalition of the Willing” supported by the White House. “I believe that if Putin does not arrive and plays games, it is the final point that he does not want to end the war,” Zelenskyy declared, framing the ceasefire demand as a litmus test of genuine Russian interest in peace talks.
In parallel, French President Emmanuel Macron publicly flagged Russia’s financial services, oil, and gas sectors as potential targets for a deeper crackdown. A Commission spokesperson confirmed that, absent a ceasefire, Brussels “is indeed looking into further sanctions,” signalling that the 17th package may not represent the ceiling of EU punitive ambitions. European Commissioner for Economy Valdis Dombrovskis underscored that all options remain on the table, even as he acknowledged the difficulty of securing unanimous support for more draconian measures without devising creative legal workarounds to veto-prone member states.
Conclusion: Sustaining pressure for peace
With the 17th sanctions package now agreed, the EU has sent a clear message: economic coercion will intensify until Russia halts hostilities and sits down for unconditional talks. By choking off Moscow’s shadow fleet revenue, isolating key military suppliers, and keeping energy and finance sanctions in reserve, Brussels has crafted a multi-layered pressure campaign. The coming days—especially Russia’s response to Zelenskyy’s ceasefire challenge—will determine whether these measures tip the balance toward diplomacy or usher in yet tougher restrictions. Either way, the EU has staked its credibility on maintaining pressure until peace prevails.
Related Links
- Council Regulation (EU) 2025/XXXX imposing restrictive measures against Russia
- European Commission Fact Sheet: EU Sanctions on Russia
- EU Sanctions Map: Ukraine-related restrictive measures
- European External Action Service: Sanctions explained
Other FinCrime Central News About Sanctions on Russia
- EU Sanctions Evasion Exposed: How Criminal Networks Bypass Restrictions and OLAF’s Role in Combatting It
- JPMorgan’s Struggle with $270B Frozen by Russian Sanctions: A Deep Dive
- Russia’s Shadow Fleet: How Western Shipowners Fuel Sanctions Evasion
- Russia and China’s Regional Clearing Platforms: A Strategic Sanctions Evasion Tool
Source: euronews, with the contribution of Eleonora Vasques
Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.