FinCrime Central - Latest AML/CFT News & Vendor Directory

Which usage for graph databases and network analysis in AML

Network analysis in AML

In recent years, graph databases and network analysis in AML have gained significant popularity due to their ability  to model and analyse complex, interlinked data structures. This has not only advanced social media analysis but also anti- money laundering (AML). Unlike relational databases which store data in rows and columns, graph databases excel in representing networks of entities and the dynamic relationship between them. This allows graph databases to traverse relationship between entities, and make it possible to discover deeper or hidden relationships and patterns. This is especially beneficial for financial crime compliance, where criminals are using increasingly layered and complexed methods to launder funds. In addition, graph algorithms help to surface patterns and characteristics that are buried in mountains of data, filter through the noise and identify truly suspicious behaviours.

Modelling complex networks of transactions

Money laundering typically involves a complex web of financial transactions, involving multiple intermediaries, accounts and entities. A graph database naturally represents these relationships, amongst other relationships in the form of shared characteristics and attributes. It helps to visualise and make sense of the interconnectedness of the nodes, highlight important nodes and relationships. This can give compliance analysts a more comprehensive view of suspicious activity alerts.

Detection of Suspicious Patterns and Anomalies Using Network Analysis in AML

Network analysis can easily identify suspicious patterns that are indicative of money laundering,  such as:

  • Circular or round-tripping transactions: funds moving in a cycle back to the original sender
  • Smurfing: breaking down large transactions into smaller ones to avoid detection.
  • Money mules: networks of individuals used to move illicit funds.

While the pattern could be easily identified, in most cases, the transactions fit what’s considered as  ‘normal’. To filter out false positives requires graph algorithms such as centrality measures, community detection and graph traversal. In addition, illicit behaviours often carry additional characteristics that could be further identified using unsupervised machine learning methods such as DBScan. Community detection can enable us to look beyond the behaviour of individuals to behaviour of groups, such as money mules.

Enhanced entity resolution

Often in conferences, AML practitioners emphasis the importance of Know Your Customer (KYC). In money laundering, fraudsters often use multiple identities, shell companies to hide their tracks. Entity resolution in AML resolves where multiple, disparate data records are referencing the same real-world entity, despite differences or inconsistencies across various sources.

With graph database, entity resolution becomes much easier. For example, identities sharing the same address, similar emails; companies sharing the same group of directors, contact details, etc are mapped to provide a dynamic holistic picture of relationships.  

Improving Response Time and Efficiency

One of the key advantages of utilizing graph databases in AML is the significant improvement in response time and operational efficiency. Traditional relational databases struggle to manage complex queries involving multiple layers of relationships, often requiring substantial computational power and time. Graph databases, however, are designed to traverse and analyze intricate networks quickly, making it easier to spot suspicious behaviors in real-time. This allows financial institutions to respond to potential threats more swiftly, reducing the window of opportunity for criminals to move illicit funds undetected. Furthermore, integrating graph algorithms into AML systems automates the detection of anomalies, freeing up valuable resources that can be redirected toward more strategic and proactive compliance efforts. This not only enhances the overall effectiveness of AML programs but also helps institutions stay ahead of increasingly sophisticated money laundering tactics.

Conclusion

In conclusion, graph databases and network analysis in AML offer powerful tools for detecting and combating money laundering. By visualizing complex webs of financial transactions, identifying suspicious patterns like circular transactions and smurfing, and enhancing entity resolution, these technologies enable compliance teams to sift through vast amounts of data more effectively. The ability to model and analyze interconnected transactions, combined with the application of advanced algorithms and machine learning, allows for more accurate detection of illicit activities while reducing false positives. Ultimately, this provides compliance analysts with a more comprehensive, data-driven approach to fighting financial crime.

From: Napier –> Full article and more

Related Posts

Share This