TD Bank finds itself at the center of a major compliance storm as the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund, Norway’s $1.9 trillion Oil Fund, places the Canadian banking giant under formal observation for alleged failures in combating financial crime. The fund’s decision to publicly scrutinize TD Bank, announced in June 2025, signals heightened expectations for global banks to uphold robust anti-money laundering standards and transparent risk management, especially after recent regulatory penalties exceeding $3 billion.

Financial Crime Concerns Prompt Global Oversight

As one of North America’s most prominent financial institutions, TD Bank is now under a four-year observation period by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, known as the Government Pension Fund Global. The fund, managed by Norges Bank on behalf of the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, periodically reviews companies for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, and can take action against firms implicated in serious financial misconduct.

The Ethics Council that advises the fund has highlighted an “unacceptable risk” associated with the bank’s alleged involvement in or facilitation of significant financial crime. Over the past decade, TD Bank has been linked to several cases of anti-money laundering (AML) failings and regulatory enforcement actions, particularly in the United States.

Norway’s decision follows a series of escalating compliance challenges. In 2024, the bank reached a high-profile settlement with United States authorities, admitting to multiple counts of AML control failures and agreeing to pay more than $3 billion in fines. These penalties stemmed from regulatory investigations into the bank’s risk management processes and transaction monitoring systems, which reportedly allowed suspicious transactions to go undetected or unreported.

The fund’s approach is rooted in Norway’s strict responsible investment guidelines, which require exclusion or observation of companies where there is a continued risk of gross corruption, money laundering, or other severe violations of ethical norms. As a result, TD Bank’s ongoing observation period will serve as a global test case for how financial institutions can recover from significant compliance failures and demonstrate lasting reform.

Anti-Money Laundering Failures and Enforcement History

Recent years have been marked by several major regulatory interventions related to anti-money laundering obligations, particularly under U.S. law. The 2024 settlement reached with American authorities represented one of the largest ever imposed on a Canadian bank for financial crime compliance lapses. U.S. authorities cited a pattern of ineffective AML controls, insufficient due diligence, and failures in detecting and reporting suspicious activities.

These issues are not isolated. In 2013, TD Bank was fined for non-compliance with AML legislation, including breaches of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and related federal requirements. Enforcement actions alleged that the bank failed to implement adequate customer due diligence, maintain effective transaction monitoring systems, and provide timely suspicious activity reports (SARs) to regulators.

The fines and settlements have pressured the institution to overhaul its compliance infrastructure and risk management frameworks. Since then, TD Bank has made changes to senior management and invested heavily in new AML technologies, staff training, and remediation programs. However, international observers and regulatory bodies remain cautious, with Norway’s Oil Fund signaling that the transformation must be proven and sustained over time.

The focus on TD Bank reflects the rising expectations among global investors and stakeholders for banks to not only comply with regulations but also proactively manage financial crime risks across all business lines and geographies.

Compliance Culture and Remediation Efforts

Ongoing compliance challenges have triggered a broad internal response. In the wake of enforcement actions, the bank has replaced key executives, strengthened its compliance teams, and committed to a multi-year remediation plan designed to address identified weaknesses.

Key elements of this plan include:

• Enhancing transaction monitoring and screening systems to improve the detection of potentially suspicious activity
• Upgrading customer due diligence processes and ongoing risk assessments for high-risk clients
• Expanding staff training on anti-money laundering requirements, including case studies and scenario-based exercises
• Regular independent audits and reviews of AML programs to ensure continued effectiveness
• Engaging external advisors to benchmark compliance frameworks against best-in-class industry standards

Despite these efforts, the Ethics Council advising Norway’s Oil Fund remains cautious. The council has publicly noted that, while the bank’s commitments are ambitious, significant uncertainty persists regarding the timely realization and depth of these reforms. The scale of remediation required illustrates the challenges faced by large, complex financial institutions seeking to pivot toward a more effective compliance culture after sustained regulatory setbacks.

Stakeholder Impact and Industry Implications

Placement under observation by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is not only significant for the bank itself but also has broader implications for the financial sector. With the Oil Fund holding a reported 1.05% stake in TD Bank at the end of 2024, the decision underscores how large, institutional investors are increasingly holding banks accountable for financial crime risks and ESG failings.

Other stakeholders, including retail investors, clients, and regulators, are closely monitoring the bank’s progress in addressing its compliance shortcomings. The observation period may impact investor confidence, affect reputation, and increase scrutiny from other global regulators. Furthermore, it sets a precedent for how sovereign wealth funds and large asset managers can leverage their influence to drive improvements in financial crime compliance across the global banking industry.

The pressure on TD Bank highlights a broader trend. Regulatory authorities in the United States, Canada, and Europe are ramping up enforcement of AML regulations such as the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and the EU’s Anti-Money Laundering Directives. Financial institutions are expected to not only comply with minimum legal requirements but also demonstrate a proactive and transparent approach to risk management and compliance governance.

This case also emphasizes the importance of internal culture and leadership commitment. Future success in overcoming current compliance crises depends on the extent to which an institution can embed a strong risk and compliance culture throughout the organization, from the boardroom to the front lines.

Conclusion: A Crossroads in AML Reform

TD Bank faces a defining moment as it works to restore confidence among stakeholders following a series of high-profile financial crime incidents. The decision by Norway’s Oil Fund to place the bank under observation for four years illustrates the growing importance of robust AML controls and ethical governance in the eyes of both regulators and global investors.

While the institution has initiated comprehensive reforms and invested heavily in compliance improvements, the road to rebuilding trust is long and requires ongoing vigilance. The observation period serves as a public reminder that effective anti-money laundering compliance is not a one-time fix but a continuous process requiring leadership, investment, and cultural change.

Ultimately, this experience may serve as a cautionary tale and a roadmap for other large financial institutions seeking to navigate complex regulatory environments and heightened stakeholder expectations. The coming years will reveal whether TD Bank can deliver on its commitments and set a new standard for compliance resilience in the global banking sector.

---

Related Links

• Norwegian Ministry of Finance – Guidelines for Observation and Exclusion
• Norges Bank Investment Management – Responsible Investment
• FinCEN – Bank Secrecy Act Regulations
• Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) – AML Guidance
• European Commission – Anti-Money Laundering Directives

Other FinCrime Central Articles About TD Bank

• TD Bank’s $3B Compliance Crisis Sparks Urgent Leadership Shakeup
• TD Bank’s 500M$ Compliance Overhaul: The Cost of Compliance Monitoring
• TD Bank’s AML Crisis Sparks Major Stake Sale

Source: Morningstar (provided by Dow Jones), by Dominic Chopping

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.

Want to promote your brand with us or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.