An exclusive article by Fred Kahn

Advancements in cryptography are reshaping how financial institutions detect illicit activity without exposing sensitive customer data. Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) stands at the forefront of this transformation, enabling computations on encrypted datasets. As anti–money laundering (AML) programs increasingly rely on cross-institutional collaboration, FHE offers a privacy-preserving alternative to traditional data-sharing models.

What is Homomorphic Encryption

Homomorphic encryption is a cutting-edge cryptographic technique that allows computations to be performed directly on encrypted data without ever needing to decrypt it first. In practice, data owners encrypt their sensitive information, such as transaction records or customer profiles, and share the ciphertext with a processing party. That party runs algorithms (for example, statistical analysis or machine-learning inference) on the encrypted data and produces an encrypted result. When the data owner decrypts that output, they obtain the correct answer as if the computations had been done on the original plaintext. This approach ensures that raw data remains confidential “in use,” addressing privacy concerns and regulatory requirements by preventing third parties from ever seeing the underlying sensitive information.

Homomorphic Encryption in AML: Privacy-Preserving Collaboration

Financial crime fighters face a difficult paradox. Sharing detailed transaction records and customer profiles across institutions can unmask sophisticated laundering schemes, yet data-privacy mandates and competitive concerns keep that information locked in silos. Fully homomorphic encryption in AML solves this, enabling banks and regulators to run joint analytics on encrypted datasets without ever revealing sensitive details. Participating entities encrypt data using a shared cryptographic scheme—commonly BFV, CKKS, or TFHE—then execute anomaly detection or network-analysis algorithms directly on the ciphertext. Only final risk alerts emerge in plaintext, preserving customer confidentiality and satisfying Data Protection by Design principles under GDPR Article 5 .

Pros of Privacy-Preserving AML with Homomorphic Encryption

• End-to-End Data Confidentiality: Data remains encrypted “in use,” not merely at rest or in transit, ensuring no raw personal or transactional information is exposed during processing. That meets or exceeds requirements for controlled data handling in FATF Recommendation 15 on new technologies.
• Regulatory Alignment: FHE-driven workflows support joint customer due-diligence (CDD) under FATF Recommendation 8 and secure wire-transfer monitoring per Recommendation 16, while adhering to cross-border data transfer rules in GDPR Chapter V .
• Superior Network Analytics: Privacy-preserving graph-neural networks (GNNs) can uncover laundering rings that span multiple banks or jurisdictions—insights unreachable through single-entity analysis.
• Reduced Counterparty Risk: Institutions never handle each other’s raw data, mitigating the danger of internal misuse or accidental leakage. Mathematical guarantees of FHE prevent key holders from reconstructing uthe nderlying plaintext from the ciphertext.
• Quantum-Ready Security: Emerging lattice-based FHE schemes resist attacks by quantum computers, future-proofing AML infrastructure against the next generation of cryptographic threats.
• Collaborative Efficiency: Automated encrypted analytics replace manual reconciliation, reducing turnaround times for complex multi-party investigations from weeks to days or hours.

Cons and Challenges of Homomorphic Encryption in AML

• Performance Overhead: Even optimized FHE libraries can be 10×–100× slower than plaintext operations when processing large transaction volumes. Real-time screening systems may need hybrid approaches or FPGA-accelerated hardware to meet latency targets.
• Development Complexity: Implementing privacy-preserving AML requires expertise in lattice cryptography, parameter selection (plaintext modulus, ciphertext modulus, polynomial degree), and noise-management strategies—skills that remain scarce in most compliance teams.
• Key Management and Trust Models: Secure generation, distribution, and rotation of FHE keys across multiple institutions introduces operational risks. A single compromised key could expose entire shared datasets, necessitating robust governance and hardware security modules (HSMs) .
• Interactive Protocol Overhead: Advanced operations such as ciphertext bootstrapping or refreshing often require interactive rounds between parties, potentially adding network latency and complexity to real-time use cases.
• Regulatory Uncertainty: While most data-privacy frameworks permit encrypted computation, few regulators have issued explicit guidance on validating FHE-based compliance tools. Pilot programs may face extended approval cycles.
• Cost Considerations: Licensing top-tier FHE libraries and investing in specialized hardware can raise tthe otal cost of ownership compared to traditional, on-premises analytics platforms.

Technical Implementation Considerations and Future Directions

Implementing fully homomorphic encryption in AML demands a structured approach:

1. Algorithm Selection:
   • BFV excels at exact-integer arithmetic, suited for rule-based screening.
   • CKKS supports approximate real-number operations ideal for machine-learning inference.
   • TFHE offers faster bootstrapping for bitwise operations, beneficial for large-scale graph algorithms.
2. Parameter Tuning:
   Choosing polynomial degrees (N), ciphertext modulus sizes (q), and noise budgets (Δ) balances performance against security. Institutions often start with conservative parameters (e.g., 128-bit security level) and iteratively optimize based on benchmarked workloads.
3. Hardware Acceleration:
   Deploying FHE on GPUs or FPGAs can reduce computation times by up to 70 percent. Cloud providers now offer GPU-enabled VM instances tailored for lattice cryptography, facilitating elastic scaling during high-volume screening periods.
4. Workflow Integration:
   • Data Onboarding: Transaction logs and customer attributes are ingested via secure APIs, encrypted client-side with public keys.
   • Encrypted Analytics: Banks and regulators run joint detection pipelines—risk scoring, clustering, GNN inference—on ciphertext without decryption.
   • Alert Generation: Final anomaly scores or alerts are decrypted by authorized parties, triggering compliance workflows.
5. Performance Monitoring:
   Continuous telemetry tracks ciphertext sizes, computation times, and error rates. Automated alerts flag parameter‐drift or degraded performance, prompting re‐benchmarking or parameter adjustment.
6. Standardization Efforts:
   The HomomorphicEncryption.org consortium and ISO working groups are drafting interoperability standards for ciphertext formats, API conventions, and multi‐party key agreements. Early adopters can influence specifications by contributing pilot‐program feedback.
7. Future Research Trends:
   • Hybrid Cryptography: Combining FHE with multi‐party computation (MPC) or secure enclaves to optimize latency-sensitive tasks.
   • Model Compression: Techniques such as quantized neural networks and model distillation reduce ciphertext sizes and computation depth.
   • Open-Source Libraries: Projects like Microsoft SEAL, PALISADE, and OpenFHE are driving rapid innovation and lowering barriers to entry.

As the technology matures, financial institutions and fintech consortia will likely establish shared cryptographic trusts—managed by neutral third parties—to streamline key governance and federation of encrypted analytics platforms.

Conclusion: Embracing Privacy-Preserving AML

Deploying homomorphic encryption in AML represents a strategic leap toward secure, privacy-first financial crime compliance. While technical hurdles—performance, complexity, key management—remain, early pilots validate that encrypted GNN and boosted‐tree pipelines can match plaintext accuracy with manageable overhead. Organizations that invest now in FHE-based collaboration will:

• Uncover cross-institution laundering networks without exposing raw customer data
• Strengthen compliance under GDPR, FATF, eIDAS, and ISO standards
• Future-proof AML operations against quantum threats and evolving data-privacy regulations

A roadmap of careful parameter tuning, hardware acceleration, and regulatory engagement will ensure that privacy-preserving AML moves from experimental to enterprise-grade, delivering both robust crime detection and ironclad data confidentiality.

Related Links

• Privacy-Preserving Graph-Based Machine Learning with Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Collaborative Anti-Money Laundering (ArXiv)
• FATF Recommendation 15 – New Technologies
• GDPR Article 5 – Principles Relating to Processing of Personal Data
• USA PATRIOT Act – Sections 312 & 314
• ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Standard

Other FinCrime Central News About New Technology For a Better AML

• Innovative Fintel Alliance Boosts AUSTRAC’s Fight Against Money Laundering
• UK Invests £121 Million in Quantum Technology to Combat Financial Crime and Fraud
• Using Federated Learning for AML in Hong Kong Banks
• FinCrime Central’s feature-based AML Solution Provider Directory

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.