FinCrime Central - Latest AML/CFT News & Vendor Directory

Rowland Andrade Convicted of Fraud and Money Laundering: AML Bitcoin Case Explained

Rowland Marcus Andrade, the controversial creator of the AML Bitcoin cryptocurrency, has recently been convicted of wire fraud and money laundering in connection with the fraudulent promotion and sale of his digital coin. This conviction follows a highly publicized, five-week trial held in the District Court of Northern California. Andrade’s actions have drawn considerable attention due to the severity of the charges and the involvement of high-profile figures, including former political lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Andrade’s scheme centered around his creation of the AML Bitcoin, which he claimed to be a technologically superior alternative to Bitcoin. However, despite these bold assertions, the AML Bitcoin was never launched, and it was later revealed that Andrade’s claims were based on deceptive and misleading statements designed to attract investors.

In this article, we will explore the key elements of the AML Bitcoin case, including the fraudulent activities Andrade engaged in, the charges brought against him, and the significant consequences that followed.

The story of AML Bitcoin begins in 2017, when Rowland Andrade began promoting the cryptocurrency with claims that it was far superior to Bitcoin in terms of technology. Andrade argued that his coin would revolutionize the cryptocurrency market, boasting features such as faster transaction speeds and greater security measures. He went as far as to assert that the Panama Canal Authority was on the verge of allowing ships to use AML Bitcoin to pay their fees, a claim that was later proven to be false.

These fabricated statements played a central role in the marketing campaign for AML Bitcoin. Andrade was able to convince thousands of individuals to invest in the cryptocurrency, with many believing that the coin would soon be operational and integrated into various industries. However, it soon became apparent that AML Bitcoin was little more than a pipe dream, and investors were left holding empty promises.

Despite never launching the coin, Andrade continued to promote it aggressively, using the illusion of a legitimate project to deceive investors. As a result, he was able to raise millions of dollars, which he then misappropriated for personal gain.

Andrade’s Use of Investor Funds

One of the most disturbing aspects of Andrade’s fraudulent activities was his blatant misuse of investor funds. According to evidence presented at the trial, Andrade used more than $2 million of the money raised for personal expenses. These funds were funneled through a series of bank accounts and used to purchase luxury items such as real estate and high-end cars. This was a clear case of money laundering, as Andrade concealed the true origin of the funds and spent them to further his personal wealth.

In a statement, U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) special agent Linda Nguyen described Andrade’s actions as “outrageous lies” that led to the loss of hard-earned money for unsuspecting investors. “Mr. Andrade’s outrageous lies lured and scammed individuals into investing their hard-earned money into a new cryptocurrency with fabricated features. But there is nothing advanced about this scheme. Rowland Marcus Andrade stole money from innocent people and used it to further his personal wealth,” Nguyen said.

The evidence presented at trial demonstrated the deliberate nature of Andrade’s actions. He used sophisticated methods to disguise his theft, moving the funds through various accounts and making it difficult to trace the money back to its original source. However, investigators were able to piece together the financial trail, ultimately leading to his conviction.

The SEC’s Role in the Case

Alongside the criminal charges brought against Andrade, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also filed a civil suit against him in 2020. The SEC alleged that Andrade and the NAC Foundation, the entity behind AML Bitcoin, had conducted fraudulent, unregistered securities sales. According to the SEC, Andrade and his associates raised a staggering $5.6 million from over 2,400 investors. Much of the money raised was misappropriated for personal use, with $1.1 million allegedly spent by Andrade himself.

The SEC’s case focused on the violation of antifraud and securities registration laws, asserting that Andrade’s actions were in direct contravention of U.S. securities regulations. The civil suit also named Jack Abramoff, a former political lobbyist, who was accused of acting as an intermediary in the fraudulent operation. Abramoff, who has a history of legal troubles, was charged with securities violations and broker-dealer registration violations in connection with the AML Bitcoin scheme.

In response to the charges, Abramoff agreed to a plea deal, which included a guilty plea and the payment of over $50,000 in disgorgement. This marked another chapter in the ongoing legal saga surrounding the AML Bitcoin case.

The Involvement of Jack Abramoff

Jack Abramoff, a figure notorious for his involvement in a wide range of corruption scandals, played a key role in the AML Bitcoin case. Known for his involvement in the 2006 lobbying scandal that led to his conviction for bribery and corruption, Abramoff’s participation in the AML Bitcoin project raised eyebrows. Although Abramoff was not the primary architect of the fraudulent scheme, his involvement added another layer of controversy to an already complicated case.

Abramoff’s role in the case was primarily as a political lobbyist, working alongside Andrade to promote AML Bitcoin and raise funds from investors. However, it was revealed that he also used his influence to help facilitate the fraudulent activities. In addition to the charges related to securities violations, Abramoff was also accused of acting as an unregistered broker-dealer, a violation that carries significant legal consequences.

While Abramoff has agreed to plead guilty and pay restitution, his involvement in the case continues to highlight the risks associated with high-profile figures using their influence to perpetrate fraudulent schemes. The connection between Andrade and Abramoff serves as a reminder of how powerful individuals can sometimes manipulate public trust for their personal gain.

Legal Consequences and Andrade’s Future

The legal ramifications for Rowland Andrade are severe. He faces up to 20 years in prison on the wire fraud charge, with an additional 10 years for money laundering. The case represents one of the most high-profile cryptocurrency fraud cases in recent years and underscores the potential dangers of investing in unregulated digital currencies.

Andrade’s sentencing is scheduled for July, and he will also be required to forfeit the assets he acquired through fraudulent means. This includes the luxury cars and real estate purchased with investor funds, which will likely be seized by authorities.

For investors who were affected by Andrade’s actions, the case serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of investing in unverified and unregulated cryptocurrency projects. The conviction of Andrade and the ongoing civil litigation underscore the importance of conducting thorough due diligence before committing to any financial investment, particularly in the volatile world of digital currencies.

Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call for the Crypto Industry

The conviction of Rowland Andrade for fraud and money laundering serves as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by unscrupulous individuals in the cryptocurrency industry. While digital currencies have the potential to revolutionize finance, they also create opportunities for fraudsters to take advantage of unsuspecting investors. The AML Bitcoin case highlights the importance of regulation and oversight in the crypto space and the need for investors to remain vigilant when considering new projects.

As the cryptocurrency market continues to evolve, it is essential for regulators, investors, and industry leaders to work together to create a safer environment for digital asset transactions. The lessons learned from the AML Bitcoin case can help shape the future of the industry and ensure that such fraudulent activities are less likely to occur in the future.

Source: US DOJ

Follow

Rowland Andrade Convicted of Fraud and Money Laundering: AML Bitcoin Case Explained

Table of Contents