The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has imposed a landmark £21,091,300 penalty on Monzo Bank Ltd for systemic failures in anti-financial crime controls spanning 2018 to 2022. The high-profile action, announced in July 2025, underscores how lapses in compliance can leave digital banks exposed to money laundering and other financial crime risks during rapid expansion. The FCA’s intervention is not only the latest in a series of similar UK enforcement actions, but also a wake-up call to the entire sector regarding the critical importance of robust onboarding, customer due diligence, and ongoing monitoring frameworks.

Monzo FCA Fine Signals Escalating Regulatory Scrutiny in Digital Banking

Monzo’s ascent from a niche fintech to a major UK retail bank has been nothing short of dramatic. By the end of 2022, its customer numbers had increased nearly tenfold in just four years. This explosive growth was accompanied by an ambitious product roadmap and an aggressive marketing push, helping Monzo secure millions of users, many of whom are digitally savvy, younger consumers attracted to its streamlined onboarding and user-friendly app.

Yet the FCA found that Monzo’s internal controls failed to evolve in line with its expanding business. The FCA investigation, based on statutory powers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) and Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017), concluded that Monzo’s anti-money laundering (AML) systems, especially those governing new account openings, risk assessment, and transaction monitoring, were not sufficiently robust to manage heightened financial crime risks. This deficiency was particularly pronounced as Monzo’s business scaled rapidly.

For instance, the bank’s customer due diligence processes struggled to verify identity and source of funds, sometimes accepting dubious or unverifiable information for account opening. Examples cited in the FCA’s action included customers providing addresses that were plainly fictitious or non-residential, such as London landmarks, as well as a lack of effective screening for politically exposed persons (PEPs) or sanctions risks. This exposed Monzo to the possibility of onboarding customers with elevated risk profiles, without appropriate controls or enhanced due diligence measures in place.

Between August 2020 and June 2022, even after the FCA imposed a restriction on opening accounts for high-risk individuals, Monzo repeatedly failed to comply. Over 34,000 high-risk customers were onboarded in violation of the restriction, pointing to systemic weaknesses in internal processes, staff training, and automated systems.

These events placed Monzo firmly in the regulatory spotlight, triggering both an independent review of its entire financial crime framework and the subsequent £21 million penalty.

Assessing the Impact of Financial Crime Control Failings

Monzo’s shortcomings have significant implications for the broader fight against money laundering and financial crime. UK law mandates all financial institutions to implement proportionate risk-based AML controls as outlined in the MLR 2017, as well as guidance from the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG) and FCA’s own supervisory strategy.

When a fast-growing bank such as Monzo falls behind on these obligations, the financial system’s wider resilience is threatened. The ability to verify customer identities, understand the source of funds, and continuously monitor for suspicious activities is not a mere regulatory checkbox—it is central to preventing the misuse of financial channels for illicit purposes.

Key issues highlighted by the FCA’s action against Monzo include:

• Weak onboarding controls: The acceptance of dubious or implausible identification information suggests Monzo’s identity verification process was inadequately resourced or lacked effective checks, especially for remote account opening.
• Inadequate customer risk assessments: Monzo’s internal risk scoring systems did not always escalate high-risk profiles for enhanced scrutiny, leading to non-compliance with required enhanced due diligence for PEPs, individuals from high-risk countries, or those with complex ownership structures.
• Poor transaction monitoring: Automated monitoring tools were found to be unable to keep up with the scale and complexity of the bank’s transactions, leading to missed red flags for suspicious or unusual account activity.
• Ineffective compliance with FCA-imposed restrictions: Despite the explicit FCA requirement to stop onboarding high-risk customers, internal communication and technical controls failed to enforce this rule in practice.
• Lack of independent review implementation: While Monzo did commission an independent assessment, early remediation efforts did not fully address root causes before additional customers were exposed.

These weaknesses are not unique to Monzo, but the scale of the violations—given the bank’s prominence in the digital banking sector—elevated the matter to a priority for UK regulators. It also exposed systemic sectoral risks, as digital onboarding, remote customer engagement, and “frictionless” user experiences can easily outpace risk management and AML safeguards if not carefully managed.

Regulatory Environment and the FCA’s Enforcement Approach

The FCA’s enforcement strategy has shifted in recent years to prioritize the quality of AML systems, especially at rapidly growing challenger banks and fintechs. The regulatory framework governing UK banks is multi-layered, drawing on primary legislation (FSMA 2000, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Money Laundering Regulations 2017), as well as guidance from the JMLSG and sectoral risk assessments published by the National Crime Agency (NCA) and FCA.

Under the MLR 2017 and subsequent amendments, UK banks must:

• Conduct comprehensive customer due diligence (CDD) before account opening.
• Apply enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk customers, including PEPs and those from high-risk jurisdictions.
• Maintain up-to-date customer risk profiles and ongoing monitoring.
• Implement automated transaction monitoring systems capable of detecting and escalating suspicious transactions for review.
• Ensure staff are trained and empowered to apply AML policies effectively.
• Submit Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) to the NCA where appropriate.

The FCA has taken an increasingly hands-on approach, including requiring firms to appoint skilled persons to conduct independent AML reviews, mandating specific remediation actions, and, where failings persist, imposing substantial fines. The penalty against Monzo is now the tenth such fine imposed on UK banks in four years for financial crime control failings, reflecting a marked escalation in regulatory expectations.

The FCA’s 2024 supervisory strategy, as published in their official retail banking roadmap, identified financial crime prevention as a core priority. This includes scrutiny of “frictionless” onboarding technologies, real-time transaction monitoring, the use of artificial intelligence in AML, and ongoing staff training for digital financial institutions.

Lessons for the Banking Industry: The Importance of Scalable AML Systems

The Monzo case delivers several important lessons for the UK banking sector, and for the broader international community observing the rapid evolution of digital finance.

First, AML and financial crime controls must be embedded as core infrastructure, not as afterthoughts. As customer numbers and product lines grow, AML frameworks must evolve, supported by scalable technology, regular process reviews, and robust risk governance.

Second, banks must ensure that restrictions or special conditions imposed by regulators are integrated into core operating systems, rather than treated as manual workarounds. The failure to prevent onboarding of high-risk customers at Monzo demonstrates the risks of inadequate system integration and poor internal communication.

Third, independent reviews and remediation programs, while useful, are only effective if their recommendations are fully implemented and tested. Ongoing regulatory dialogue and clear accountability are crucial.

Fourth, senior management and boards must prioritize AML compliance, investing both in technology and in ongoing staff training. Fines of this magnitude can severely impact a bank’s reputation, share price, and ability to operate freely in the marketplace.

Other financial institutions, especially in the digital or “challenger” space, should view the Monzo penalty as a warning. Regulatory expectations are only increasing, and the cost of failing to meet them is rising both financially and reputationally.

Conclusion: The FCA’s Monzo Penalty as a Turning Point for UK AML Enforcement

The £21 million fine levied against Monzo by the FCA is more than a simple compliance story; it is a signal that regulatory scrutiny of digital banks’ financial crime controls will only intensify in the coming years. As the sector continues to grow and innovate, banks must keep pace with both regulatory expectations and criminal typologies, investing in scalable, technology-driven, and risk-based AML frameworks.

The FCA’s action sets a precedent and a challenge for all market participants: only those who maintain rigorous, proactive anti-financial crime measures will avoid regulatory censure and safeguard the integrity of the UK financial system.

---

Related Links

• Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (legislation.gov.uk)
• Joint Money Laundering Steering Group Guidance
• FCA 2024 Supervisory Strategy for Retail Banks (PDF)
• National Crime Agency: SARs Reporting

Other FinCrime Central Articles About NeoBanks

• Proactive Compliance: A Strategic Advantage for Neobanks to Avoid AML Penalties
• Revolut Fined €3.5 Million for AML Failures: What It Means for Digital Banks
• Klarna hit with £35 Million Fine for AML Breach

Source: FCA

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.

Want to promote your brand with us or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.