AML vendors operating across Europe and the UK are directly impacted as the European Supervisory Authorities and UK financial regulators sign a Memorandum of Understanding on the oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers under DORA, aimed at ensuring unified supervision of digital infrastructure. This landmark agreement clarifies that AML vendors using public cloud environments must implement rigorous safeguards to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of sensitive financial intelligence. As anti-money-laundering service providers increasingly migrate processing workloads to third-party infrastructure, regulatory attention is sharpening on how client data secrecy is maintained. Under the new framework, firms must demonstrate that their reliance on external cloud hosting does not introduce vulnerabilities leading to unauthorized access or the exposure of private transaction records.
Table of Contents
Confidentiality Frameworks for Cloud-Based AML Systems
The migration of anti-money laundering software to public cloud platforms has revolutionized the scalability of compliance operations while introducing complex challenges for maintaining professional secrecy. The Digital Operational Resilience Act addresses these challenges by requiring service providers to establish comprehensive governance frameworks specifically tailored to the unique risks of shared infrastructure. When an AML vendor utilizes a public cloud, the responsibility for protecting confidential information is shared between the software provider and the cloud infrastructure host. Regulators now demand that these vendors conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential points of data leakage within their virtualized environments. This includes evaluating the security of data at rest, in transit, and during processing to ensure that sensitive client identities remain shielded from any external interference. The focus is on creating a transparent chain of custody for all information handled by the service, ensuring that no unauthorized parties can gain access to the raw data used for screening. By enforcing these high standards, the law ensures that the move toward cloud computing does not dilute the traditional values of confidentiality that are essential for effective financial monitoring.
Technical Safeguards for Protecting Client Data
Protecting the confidentiality of files within a public cloud environment requires the implementation of advanced technical safeguards that go beyond standard industry practices. AML service providers are now expected to utilize sophisticated encryption techniques where the vendor maintains exclusive control over the cryptographic keys, preventing the cloud host from accessing the underlying data. This level of technical isolation is critical for ensuring that professional secrecy is maintained even if the cloud provider’s broader infrastructure is targeted by cyber threats. Furthermore, the Digital Operational Resilience Act encourages the use of secure enclaves and confidential computing technologies that protect data while it is actively being analyzed by detection algorithms. These measures are designed to prevent the exposure of sensitive, suspicious activity reports and personal identification documents that are stored within the cloud ecosystem. Vendors must also implement granular access management policies, ensuring that only verified personnel with a clear business need can interact with the confidential information. Regular technical audits and vulnerability scans of the cloud configuration are mandatory to detect any misconfigurations that could inadvertently expose private data to the public internet. This proactive approach to security ensures that the digital tools used for crime prevention remain as secure as the physical vaults of traditional banks.
Contractual Accountability and Professional Secrecy Equivalence
The relationship between AML vendors and their public cloud providers is now governed by strict contractual requirements mandated by the new regulatory environment. These contracts must clearly define the obligations of each party regarding the protection of confidential information and the maintenance of professional secrecy standards. Under the Digital Operational Resilience Act, service providers must ensure that their cloud hosts are legally bound to uphold the same level of confidentiality as the financial institutions themselves. This is particularly important when data is stored or processed across different legal jurisdictions, as the equivalence of secrecy regimes must be verified by the relevant supervisory authorities. The recent Memorandum of Understanding between European and UK regulators highlights the necessity of these cross-border legal protections to prevent regulatory gaps in data security. AML vendors are required to include specific clauses in their service level agreements that grant them the right to audit the cloud provider’s security practices and incident response capabilities. This legal accountability ensures that the vendor remains responsible for the integrity of their clients’ data, regardless of where the physical servers are located. By formalizing these requirements, regulators are creating a more transparent and accountable market for cloud-based compliance services.
Ensuring Resilience in Financial Crime Detection
The ultimate goal of focusing on confidentiality within the cloud is to ensure the long term resilience and reliability of the global financial monitoring system. If the confidential information managed by AML vendors were to be compromised, the trust in the entire anti-money laundering framework would be severely undermined. The Digital Operational Resilience Act provides the necessary structure to ensure that, as technology evolves, the safeguards for sensitive data evolve alongside it. By mandating the use of public cloud environments that meet these high standards of security, regulators are fostering an environment where innovation and safety coexist. This focus on digital operational resilience ensures that the essential task of monitoring financial flows can continue without interruption, even in the face of sophisticated global cyber attacks. AML service providers that embrace these requirements not only meet their legal obligations but also strengthen their reputation as reliable partners for the banking sector. The transition to cloud-based compliance represents a significant opportunity for the industry, provided that the foundational principles of professional secrecy and data protection are never compromised. As the oversight of critical third-party providers becomes more integrated on an international level, the security of the cloud will remain a top priority for financial regulators around the world.
Key Points
- Public cloud environments used by AML vendors must implement advanced encryption where the vendor retains sole control over all security keys.
- The Digital Operational Resilience Act requires contractual equivalence in professional secrecy between compliance firms and their cloud infrastructure providers.
- Service providers must utilize technical isolation and confidential computing to protect sensitive client data during active processing in the cloud.
- Regulators demand granular access controls and continuous monitoring of cloud configurations to prevent the unauthorized exposure of confidential information.
Related Links
- European Banking Authority Guidance on Outsourcing to Cloud Service Providers
- Financial Conduct Authority Statement on DORA and Third Party Risks
- Digital Operational Resilience Act Provisions on ICT Third-Party Risk
- Bank of England Policy on Operational Resilience for Critical Cloud Services
- ESMA Technical Standards for Information Security in Financial Markets
Other FinCrime Central Articles About the Impact of DORA on AML Solution Providers
- DORA Oversight Raises Sharp Challenges for AML Solution Providers
- DORA Oversight Pushes Stronger Compliance for Cloud-Based AML Providers
- DORA’s Difficult Mandate: Overcoming the Challenges of Cloud-Dependent AML Solutions for ICTs
Source: European Banking Authority
Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.
Want to promote your brand, or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.
