An exclusive article by Fred Kahn

DORA establishes a landmark regulatory framework that is reshaping how financial institutions deploy and manage cloud-based Anti-Money Laundering (AML) solutions across Europe. The adoption of cloud-native compliance tools has surged, transforming the landscape of AML operations while introducing new operational and regulatory complexities. With the implementation of the Digital Operational Resilience Act and its robust oversight mechanisms, banks, investment firms, and fintechs that rely on cloud service providers for core AML activities now face heightened requirements and expectations. This article examines the tangible impact of DORA oversight on financial institutions using cloud-based AML, analyzing how the regulation affects risk management, resilience, and the evolving relationship between technology and compliance.

Cloud-Based AML Solutions and the DORA Oversight Framework

Cloud computing has fundamentally reshaped how financial institutions conduct AML activities. By leveraging scalable infrastructure, advanced analytics, and rapid deployment capabilities, firms can enhance transaction monitoring, customer due diligence, and suspicious activity reporting. Major banks and smaller institutions alike now routinely contract with global cloud service providers (CSPs) to deliver these essential functions. However, the migration to cloud-based AML solutions introduces a unique set of dependencies and risks, particularly around cybersecurity, data sovereignty, and third-party concentration.

Recognizing the systemic importance of certain information and communications technology (ICT) providers, the European Union enacted DORA to establish harmonized rules for the digital operational resilience of the financial sector. Central to DORA is the oversight of “critical third-party providers” (CTPPs)—including major cloud platforms supporting AML solutions. The regulation mandates a coordinated, risk-based approach to supervising how these external service providers support financial institutions, with the goal of ensuring the resilience, security, and integrity of Europe’s financial system.

Impact on Financial Institutions Using Cloud-Based AML

DORA oversight carries significant implications for financial institutions that rely on cloud-based AML systems. The new regulatory environment compels firms to reassess their outsourcing strategies, strengthen internal risk management, and participate in a continuous dialogue with both their technology vendors and supervisory authorities. Below are the principal areas of impact:

Enhanced Accountability for Third-Party Risk

Under DORA, financial institutions remain ultimately responsible for the management of ICT risk, even when AML operations are outsourced to a cloud provider. The oversight framework does not relieve firms of their duties to assess, monitor, and mitigate risks arising from cloud-based AML solutions. This means banks and regulated entities must maintain detailed registers of their ICT outsourcing arrangements, conduct regular due diligence on their providers, and ensure robust contractual safeguards are in place.

The designation of a cloud provider as a CTPP triggers heightened scrutiny of the provider’s controls, continuity measures, and incident response capabilities. Financial institutions are expected to cooperate with their competent authorities, providing timely and accurate information about the structure and functioning of their AML solutions and their dependency on third-party providers. Failure to adequately manage these risks can result in supervisory interventions, recommendations, or even requirements to terminate problematic relationships.

Operational Resilience and Business Continuity

For cloud-based AML solutions, operational resilience is no longer a “nice to have”—it is a legal obligation. DORA requires both financial entities and their critical ICT providers to demonstrate the ability to withstand, respond to, and recover from disruptions. This includes cyberattacks, system failures, and broader incidents affecting cloud infrastructure.

Financial institutions must perform regular scenario-based testing of their cloud-based AML systems, evaluate the effectiveness of incident detection and response processes, and maintain up-to-date business continuity and disaster recovery plans. The oversight activities outlined in DORA, such as general investigations and inspections, may focus specifically on the operational resilience of cloud-based AML platforms, including data backup strategies, access controls, and the integrity of audit trails.

Furthermore, firms must be prepared to provide regulators with evidence of their resilience capabilities—whether through documentation, independent assurance reports, or real-time incident notifications. This creates an environment of continuous readiness, in which compliance teams, IT departments, and risk functions must work together to meet regulatory expectations.

Data Security, Sovereignty, and Regulatory Reporting

One of the most complex challenges for financial institutions using cloud-based AML is ensuring data security and compliance with EU data localization requirements. DORA oversight emphasizes the need for rigorous security protocols, encryption standards, and mechanisms to prevent unauthorized access or data breaches. Cloud providers designated as CTPPs must undergo regular assessments of their security practices, but financial institutions retain the responsibility for ensuring that customer and transaction data remain protected and accessible at all times.

Additionally, the regulatory focus on data sovereignty may influence how and where AML data is stored and processed. Institutions must have clear visibility into data flows, locations of data centers, and any subcontracting arrangements involving non-EU entities. When required, financial institutions must be able to produce records and evidence for regulatory inspections or investigations, regardless of whether the data resides in the cloud or on-premises.

The reporting obligations under DORA also extend to incidents and disruptions involving cloud-based AML solutions. Firms must establish processes for timely notification to their competent authorities and, where applicable, cooperate with oversight bodies during incident investigations. These requirements elevate the importance of transparency and auditability across the entire AML technology stack.

Strategic Implications and Vendor Management

DORA’s criticality assessment process highlights the risk of concentration in the cloud services market, where a handful of major CSPs dominate. Financial institutions using cloud-based AML must assess their exposure to potential systemic outages or supply chain vulnerabilities linked to their providers. The regulation encourages firms to develop exit strategies, conduct regular reviews of vendor performance, and diversify their ICT suppliers when feasible.

From a procurement perspective, financial institutions must negotiate contracts that include provisions for regulatory cooperation, access rights for overseers, and clear service level agreements aligned with DORA’s requirements. The selection of a cloud provider for AML should now be informed not only by technical capabilities and cost, but also by the provider’s ability to comply with regulatory expectations and to respond to supervisory requests.

Oversight activities, such as general investigations and inspections, may result in recommendations affecting contractual relationships or the use of specific AML functionalities. Financial institutions must be agile in implementing remediation plans and communicating with both vendors and regulators to address any deficiencies identified during oversight.

Opportunities for Enhanced Collaboration and Innovation

While DORA oversight introduces a more stringent regulatory environment, it also fosters opportunities for collaboration between financial institutions, technology providers, and supervisory authorities. The requirement for continuous engagement with regulators and participation in sector-wide resilience initiatives can help firms strengthen their AML processes, share best practices, and innovate in response to emerging threats.

The harmonization of operational resilience requirements across the EU reduces regulatory fragmentation, making it easier for financial institutions to adopt and scale cloud-based AML solutions. This can drive investment in advanced analytics, machine learning, and federated learning technologies that enhance detection capabilities and reduce false positives.

Moreover, the transparency and accountability embedded in DORA oversight can boost customer and market confidence in cloud-based AML, supporting the broader digital transformation of financial services.

Navigating DORA Oversight: Compliance Strategies for Financial Institutions

To thrive in the DORA era, financial institutions leveraging cloud-based AML solutions should consider the following compliance strategies:

1. Integrate ICT Risk into Enterprise-Wide Governance: Treat third-party ICT risk as a core element of the institution’s operational risk framework. Boards and senior management should have clear oversight of cloud-based AML arrangements, supported by detailed policies and risk appetites.
2. Maintain Comprehensive Registers and Documentation: Ensure that all cloud outsourcing contracts, service-level agreements, and data flows are meticulously recorded, regularly updated, and readily available for supervisory review.
3. Engage in Proactive Vendor Risk Management: Select cloud AML providers with demonstrable compliance credentials and the ability to cooperate with regulatory oversight. Conduct periodic due diligence, including independent audits and certifications.
4. Develop Resilience and Exit Strategies: Test business continuity and disaster recovery plans for cloud-based AML, and maintain viable exit and transition arrangements to mitigate the risk of provider failure or regulatory action.
5. Invest in Security and Compliance Technology: Leverage advanced security solutions, automated reporting tools, and continuous monitoring systems to meet DORA’s operational resilience and incident notification requirements.
6. Promote Internal Collaboration and Training: Foster strong collaboration between compliance, IT, risk, and legal teams to ensure a unified approach to DORA compliance. Provide regular training on the evolving regulatory landscape and incident response protocols.
7. Engage with Supervisory Authorities: Build constructive relationships with competent authorities, participate in sectoral dialogues, and respond promptly to information requests or recommendations arising from oversight activities.

Conclusion: DORA Oversight as a Catalyst for Secure Cloud-Based AML

DORA oversight represents a transformative development for financial institutions using cloud-based AML solutions. By imposing robust, coordinated requirements on both financial entities and their critical third-party providers, the framework aims to enhance the security, resilience, and integrity of AML operations across the European financial sector. While the regulatory demands are considerable, the benefits include greater transparency, improved risk management, and a more secure foundation for digital innovation.

Financial institutions that proactively adapt to the DORA oversight regime—by strengthening governance, investing in resilience, and deepening collaboration with both regulators and technology partners—will be well positioned to deliver effective, future-proof AML compliance. The journey may be complex, but the destination is a more resilient and trustworthy financial ecosystem for all stakeholders.

---

Related Links

• Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) – Official Journal of the EU
• ESAs Guidelines on DORA Oversight Cooperation
• European Banking Authority DORA Resources
• Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1502 – CTPP Criteria
• ENISA Guidelines on Cloud Security

Other FinCrime Central Articles Related to DORA

• The Countdown to DORA AML Compliance
• DORA’s Difficult Mandate: Overcoming the Challenges of Cloud-Dependent AML Solutions for ICTs
• Achieving DORA Compliance: A Guide to Meeting the 2025 Deadline

Source: European Banking Authority (PDF)

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.

Want to promote your brand with us or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.