Beximco has become the focus of a sweeping investigation into trade based money laundering in Bangladesh, after authorities uncovered what they believe was a structure designed to move export funds overseas without returning payment to the country. Once export documents were created, including invoices and shipping papers, financial institutions processed the transactions as normal trade. Letters of credit were issued, and the shipments were reported as completed, which signaled to the banking system that payment was on its way. Instead of bringing the proceeds back into the country, the payments were redirected to a foreign intermediary presented as a trade partner.

Trade-based money laundering as the mechanism for capital flight

Trade-based money laundering is a technique that hides illicit cash flows within the processes of international commerce. It relies on documents that appear legitimate, such as invoices, packing lists and letters of credit. The Beximco allegations revolve around export transactions carried out by multiple apparel companies linked to the group. Letters of credit were opened through a bank in Dhaka, shipments were declared and payment was supposed to arrive from overseas buyers. On paper, everything looked routine. The core allegation is that the money never came back, even though the exports were claimed to be complete.

The investigation lists seventeen corporate entities within the Beximco ecosystem, including apparel manufacturers of varying sizes. According to the findings, they engaged in repeated export transactions from 2020 to 2024. The bank issued letters of credit at the request of each company. These instruments guaranteed payment once the goods reached overseas buyers. In theory, export proceeds would then be credited back into Bangladesh, reinforcing the country’s foreign exchange reserves.

Instead, authorities claim that nearly ninety seven million dollars worth of export proceeds were diverted to a foreign trading entity headquartered in Dubai. The entity allegedly receiving the funds was connected through ownership to individuals linked to Beximco leadership. Payments traveled from the bank in Dhaka to the Dubai company and were then routed across several jurisdictions, including Europe, North America, the Middle East and Africa. No equivalent funds were credited back into Bangladesh after the exports were recorded.

This is a classic trade-based laundering pattern. The paperwork gives the illusion that real merchandise is changing hands and that payment is in process. The mechanism allows a company to justify why money is leaving the country without triggering immediate alarm. If the documentation is complete, banks rely on it to process cross border transactions. The misdirection lies in what happens afterward. Once the funds are received abroad, the overseas entity becomes free to move the money further and conceal its final destination.

There are several laundering variations linked to trade schemes. Over invoicing inflates the value of goods to justify higher payment transfers. Under invoicing undervalues shipments, allowing the exporter to move the difference into private accounts abroad. False invoicing involves recording goods that never existed. Authorities have not publicly detailed which variation applies in each of the Beximco linked transactions, but the consistent theme is that proceeds were not repatriated.

Another trade-based method that appears relevant here is beneficial ownership concealment. When the overseas entity receiving funds is related to insiders, the transaction looks like trade but behaves like a transfer of value between linked parties. If beneficial ownership is obscured, banks may process payments without realizing that the recipient and the sender belong to the same economic group. Investigators state that this occurred here, as the Dubai entity was owned by individuals closely tied to Beximco leadership.

The result was a multi year pattern of export declarations that showed goods leaving Bangladesh while the money associated with those exports flowed out and stayed overseas. Over time, individual transactions accumulated to nearly Tk 12 billion.

Beximco’s structure and the weaknesses exploited

A case of this magnitude rarely happens without internal vulnerabilities. Corporate structures that rely on multiple subsidiaries with independent banking relationships are harder to monitor. Each entity can generate its own export paperwork and initiate its own transactions. In the Beximco scenario, seventeen companies linked to apparel production reportedly used letters of credit through a single bank branch. The volume of supporting documents, combined with the speed of trade finance operations, made it difficult to detect anomalies from any single transaction.

A key aspect of the allegations relates to oversight gaps. When a company regularly exports goods, banks monitor whether proceeds return within regulatory timeframes. Persistent delays or missing proceeds should trigger escalation. Yet the exports linked to Beximco entities continued across multiple years without full payment returning to Bangladesh. The repeated nature of missing export earnings was a red flag that was either overlooked or not acted on early enough.

Another structural weakness is the use of a related trading entity abroad. In trade finance, it is not unusual to have intermediaries that consolidate exports, especially in apparel distribution networks. However, when that intermediary is owned by relatives of senior executives, the risk of value shifting increases exponentially. Regulatory expectations demand disclosure of beneficial ownership of counterparties. If the beneficial owner remains concealed or not verified, banks may unknowingly process transfers that facilitate capital flight.

A further vulnerability lies in the monitoring of export documentation itself. Trade-based laundering thrives where documentation volume is high and verification is low. Export declarations include invoices, packing lists, customs reports, certificates of origin and logistical proof. Each form can be forged or subtly manipulated. A slightly altered price, a mismatched weight, or incorrect classification codes can redirect millions in value. If internal audit functions are weak, and if compliance teams lack authority over related companies, falsification can continue without detection.

Apparel exports in Bangladesh rely on tight timelines and rapid shipping cycles. That urgency sometimes leads to shortcuts in verification. The allegations against Beximco illustrate how individuals can leverage that environment. Once payment is routed overseas, it becomes part of an international financial loop. Offshore jurisdictions may not require strong disclosure. Funds can be layered through multiple banks, moved into investments or property holdings and transformed into assets outside the scope of domestic regulators.

The authorities seized land, a luxury flat and a triplex unit linked to individuals associated with the companies. Bank accounts were frozen and travel bans imposed. These steps reflect a strategic shift. Instead of waiting for courts to decide, investigators are safeguarding assets now to prevent dissipation of wealth.

Bangladesh’s rise in enforcement and strategic deterrence

The Beximco investigation marks a turning point for Bangladesh in handling large scale corporate money laundering. Historically, under invoicing and false export proceeds have been recurring concerns. Export driven sectors, especially garments, represent a substantial portion of foreign currency inflow. When proceeds of exports do not return, national reserves weaken and the broader economy absorbs the loss.

This case signals that the government is moving toward preventive enforcement. The strategy includes simultaneous freezing of bank accounts, asset attachment, and travel bans. These measures remove access to financial resources that could otherwise allow the suspects to move assets abroad or interfere with investigations.

The action also signals to banks that cross border trade must be monitored beyond basic document collection. It reinforces expectations that banks must request proof of payment for exports, verify that proceeds return and escalate unexplained delays. Monitoring tools are likely to evolve from transaction based screening to pattern based analytics. If a company consistently exports but fails to return money, the bank will be expected to intervene.

Authorities want to avoid cases where capital flight damages public confidence in the export ecosystem. Repeated non repatriation distorts competition. If one corporate group channels earnings abroad while others comply with regulations, the compliant companies operate with constraints while the non compliant group gains access to unreported offshore capital. That creates an uneven playing field. The investigation shows how enforcement can rebalance the market and deter others from using trade to conceal financial crime.

This case has drawn significant public attention because of the company’s stature. Large conglomerates often operate complex structures with multiple subsidiaries. Without strong corporate governance, such structures can shield transactions from oversight. Compliance frameworks inside large groups cannot depend solely on subsidiary level controls. Centralized monitoring, transparency on related party trading and routine beneficial ownership disclosures become essential. When senior leadership is implicated, conventional internal controls are insufficient. Only active regulatory supervision can prevent misuse of trade systems.

Bangladesh is now entering a new phase of enforcement maturity. Investigations no longer stop at the transactional layer. Regulators are pursuing direct accountability for individuals. The fact that senior figures have been arrested and charged shows that the intent is not limited to confiscation, but focused on deterrence through legal consequences.

The future of accountability for Beximco and the market

The Beximco case will shape the future of trade finance oversight in Bangladesh. Its impact extends beyond the company. Banks now recognize that export proceeds must be validated through proof of receipt, not just paperwork submission. Corporate groups will be pushed to improve transparency in related party transactions. Regulators will refine their tools to detect patterns rather than isolated anomalies.

The allegations demonstrate that documentation alone cannot guarantee legitimacy. A letter of credit does not prove actual payment. A shipping declaration does not prove that the shipment occurred at the declared value. Reconciliation between export value and foreign currency receipts will likely become mandatory, and delays will require formal justification.

For organizations operating internationally, this is a call to strengthen internal risk management. A compliance culture cannot be an optional feature. When leadership does not create controls, laundering schemes can operate through legitimate channels and remain hidden for years. The Beximco case illustrates that regulators can and will dismantle such structures.

The long term benefit of stronger enforcement is the protection of the national economy. Export proceeds returning through transparent channels support currency stability, investor confidence and sustainable industry growth. If Bangladesh wants to position itself as a safe jurisdiction for trade and investment, then financial crime risks must be managed decisively.

The message is clear. Trade cannot be a façade for capital flight. When documentation masks the real movement of money, regulators will intervene, assets will be seized and accountability will be enforced.

---

Related Links

• Bangladesh Bank Policies and Circulars
• Bangladesh Financial Intelligence Unit
• National Board of Revenue
• Ministry of Commerce – Bangladesh
• Office of the Attorney General – Dhaka

Other FinCrime Central Articles About Trade-Based Money Laundering

• Trade-Based Money Laundering Threatens Asia-Pacific Supply Chains
• Why South–South Trade Routes Are the Next TBML Battleground
• How Smart Data Linkage Could Break the TBML Game for Good

Source: The Financial Express

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.

Want to promote your brand, or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.