The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has imposed a six-month ban on Mr. Kao Cheng Yung, a former responsible officer (RO) and managing director of CSC Futures (HK) Limited (CSC), from re-entering the securities and futures industry. This ban, which will last from 19 April 2025 to 18 October 2025, comes after serious failures related to anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-financing of terrorism (CFT) measures during his tenure at CSC.

The disciplinary action is the result of the SFC’s investigation into CSC’s failures to comply with regulatory requirements between January 2017 and December 2018. Specifically, these failures involved a lack of proper due diligence, inadequate risk assessments, and a failure to implement effective AML and CFT controls, which undermined market integrity and put the firm at risk of facilitating financial crimes such as money laundering and terrorism financing.

The Role of Kao Cheng Yung in CSC’s Regulatory Failures

Kao’s responsibilities at CSC were extensive. As the manager-in-charge of overall management oversight and key business lines, as well as the managing director, Kao was tasked with ensuring that the firm operated within the regulatory framework and met all necessary compliance standards. His role included overseeing CSC’s risk management protocols and the implementation of AML and CFT systems.

However, the SFC’s investigation found that Kao’s failure to properly manage the company’s compliance functions contributed to the firm’s regulatory breaches. Despite his position of authority, Kao did not ensure that the firm was diligent in assessing and managing the risks associated with its clients’ trading activities. This included failing to properly assess and monitor client transactions involving customer-supplied systems (CSSs) used for electronic trading.

Consequences of Inadequate Due Diligence

One of the most concerning findings of the SFC’s investigation was that CSC allowed clients to use CSSs to place orders without conducting the proper due diligence to assess the associated risks. These systems were designed by clients themselves and allowed them to execute trades through CSC’s infrastructure, which involved connecting to CSC’s broker supplied system (BSS) via application programming interfaces (APIs).

APIs allowed for the seamless transfer of data between the client’s CSS and CSC’s BSS, but this setup created additional risks, particularly when the CSSs were not properly vetted. The SFC’s investigation revealed that CSC had failed to assess the risks associated with these systems and failed to ensure that clients using them were not engaging in suspicious activities. This oversight allowed the company to facilitate transactions that could have potentially been linked to money laundering or terrorist financing.

In addition, the SFC found that CSC failed to scrutinize client deposits that were inconsistent with their declared financial profiles. These deposits raised red flags but were not adequately investigated by the firm, which is a critical lapse in any effective AML system. The failure to examine such deposits allowed potentially illicit transactions to proceed without proper scrutiny, thereby increasing the firm’s exposure to financial crimes.

The Seriousness of CSC’s Regulatory Lapses

The SFC’s decision to ban Kao underscores the severity of CSC’s compliance failures. The regulator determined that the lapses in the firm’s risk management systems were not only in violation of regulatory requirements but also posed a significant risk to the integrity of the financial market. By failing to monitor client activities diligently and neglecting to implement effective AML and CFT systems, CSC contributed to an environment where financial crimes could go undetected.

From a regulatory perspective, the SFC’s action emphasizes that non-compliance with AML/CFT regulations is a serious matter, with the potential to undermine public confidence in the financial system. The SFC’s decision to impose a ban on Kao is a reflection of the need for strong leadership within firms to ensure that compliance is taken seriously at all levels.

Additionally, the SFC’s ruling serves as a reminder to financial institutions that regulatory authorities will take decisive action when AML and CFT obligations are ignored. The severity of the penalties reflects the importance of upholding financial regulations to ensure the smooth operation of financial markets and the protection of the broader economy.

The Broader Impact of the SFC’s Decision

The decision to ban Kao for six months is part of a broader effort by the SFC to hold individuals accountable for failures in compliance and to send a strong message to the industry. The SFC’s commitment to enforcing AML and CFT regulations is crucial in maintaining the integrity of Hong Kong’s financial market, especially given the increasing global focus on anti-money laundering efforts.

For financial institutions, the message is clear: regulators expect firms to adhere to stringent compliance standards, and failure to do so will result in severe consequences. The SFC’s decision emphasizes that compliance is not just a matter of internal policy but a regulatory requirement that must be followed rigorously. Firms that fail to implement adequate risk management and AML systems expose themselves to significant legal and financial risks.

Moreover, the SFC’s ruling places additional pressure on senior executives and management teams to ensure that their firms are fully compliant with all regulatory requirements. The case of Kao Cheng Yung highlights the fact that individuals in senior positions, especially those with oversight responsibilities, must be proactive in ensuring that their firms’ operations are fully compliant with AML and CFT regulations.

Impact of the Ban on Kao Cheng Yung

The ban on Kao will significantly affect his ability to re-enter the securities and futures industry, particularly in Hong Kong, where the SFC’s oversight is rigorous and influential. While Kao’s career was previously marked by a clean disciplinary record, this suspension will impact his professional reputation and could hinder his ability to work in the industry in the future.

Despite the clean record, the SFC’s ruling highlights that the failure of a senior executive to ensure compliance with AML and CFT regulations has serious consequences. The fact that Kao was in a leadership role during the period of non-compliance suggests that the SFC views leadership accountability as critical to upholding the integrity of financial markets.

However, the SFC’s ruling also provides an opportunity for Kao to reflect on his professional conduct and the importance of maintaining compliance in a highly regulated industry. The ban may serve as a reminder to others in similar roles about the risks associated with poor management and the consequences of non-compliance.

The Importance of Robust AML/CFT Controls in the Financial Industry

This case serves as an important lesson for financial institutions globally. In today’s complex financial landscape, the risks associated with money laundering and terrorism financing are significant. As such, institutions must have robust AML and CFT systems in place, and these systems must be constantly reviewed and updated to address emerging threats.

Firms must go beyond simply meeting minimum regulatory requirements. They must invest in technologies and systems that enable real-time monitoring of transactions and flagging of suspicious activity. Moreover, senior management must ensure that all employees are adequately trained in recognizing and addressing AML and CFT risks.

Effective AML/CFT systems not only help firms comply with regulations but also protect their reputation and ensure that they are not inadvertently facilitating illicit activities. Institutions that fail to prioritize compliance risk damaging their reputation and face the possibility of severe sanctions from regulators.

Conclusion: The Need for Stronger Leadership in AML/CFT Compliance

The ban on Mr. Kao Cheng Yung is a clear indication that regulatory authorities are committed to enforcing high standards of compliance within the financial sector. Senior executives, especially those in positions of oversight, must take responsibility for ensuring that their firms adhere to AML and CFT regulations. The SFC’s disciplinary action emphasizes the need for strong leadership and vigilance in protecting financial markets from illicit activities.

With the growing complexity of global financial systems and the increasing scrutiny from regulators worldwide, institutions must be proactive in managing compliance risks. Firms that invest in comprehensive AML/CFT systems and leadership accountability will not only avoid regulatory penalties but also contribute to the stability and integrity of the global financial system.

---

Related Links

• Securities and Futures Commission – Latest News on Regulatory Actions
• Understanding AML Compliance for Financial Institutions
• Best Practices for AML/CFT Compliance in Financial Institutions
• Risks of Customer Supplied Systems in Trading Platforms

Other FinCrime Central News About SFC’s Actions

• SFC reprimands and fines CSC Futures (HK) Limited $4.95 million for regulatory breaches
• SFC reprimands and fines Zheshang International Financial Holdings Co., Limited $2.66 million for regulatory breaches
• Hong Kong’s SFC Embraces Regtech to Combat Money Laundering

Source: HK SFC