FinCrime Central - Latest AML/CFT News & Vendor Directory

Understanding Primary Sanctions and Secondary Sanctions: Key Differences Explained

sanctions primary secondary differences fincrime financial crime

An exclusive article by Fred Kahn

In the complex world of global finance, sanctions play a critical role in regulating international relations, ensuring compliance with national security, and promoting ethical business practices. Whether you’re an AML specialist, a financial institution, or a business operating in international markets, understanding the difference between primary and secondary sanctions is essential. These sanctions, while related, serve distinct purposes and impact organizations and governments differently. This article will break down the key differences, provide real-world examples, and explore how they influence financial compliance and global transactions.

Sanctions are often tools used by governments to promote national security, prevent illicit activities like money laundering or terrorism financing, and enforce foreign policy goals. They can target individuals, entities, or even entire countries and can take many forms, such as trade restrictions, asset freezes, or financial restrictions. The two main categories of sanctions are primary and secondary sanctions, and understanding these distinctions is crucial for compliance professionals.

Primary Sanctions: Direct and Targeted Measures

Primary sanctions are the most direct form of sanction and generally involve measures imposed by one country on another. These sanctions apply to the sanctioned country and its entities, such as businesses, government officials, and organizations within the country’s jurisdiction. In essence, primary sanctions restrict the ability of the target country or its representatives to engage in specific activities, particularly financial transactions or trade.

For example, when the United States imposes sanctions on a country like Iran, these sanctions are intended to prevent U.S. entities (and U.S. citizens) from doing business with Iran or engaging in financial transactions that benefit Iranian entities. This type of sanction directly targets the sanctioned country, and compliance obligations fall on U.S. persons and organizations.

The United States, as a global economic powerhouse, frequently imposes primary sanctions, as seen in its long-standing sanctions against countries like North Korea, Iran, and Cuba. These sanctions are often aimed at achieving foreign policy goals, such as preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons or curbing human rights abuses.

Secondary Sanctions: A Global Approach

In contrast, secondary sanctions take a broader approach and target not just the sanctioned country but also foreign entities that engage in prohibited transactions with the sanctioned target. In other words, secondary sanctions extend the reach of primary sanctions by penalizing non-U.S. or non-local entities that do business with the sanctioned country or its representatives.

For instance, if a European company engages in a transaction with an Iranian entity, the U.S. may impose secondary sanctions on that European company. This means that while the European company is not directly restricted by U.S. law, it could face financial penalties or restrictions if it continues to do business with the sanctioned country or its entities. Secondary sanctions aim to isolate the sanctioned target more effectively by pressuring other countries or foreign businesses to comply with the original sanctions.

A notable example of secondary sanctions occurred in 2018, when the United States re-imposed sanctions on Iran following its withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal. As part of this, the U.S. applied secondary sanctions on companies from countries like France, Germany, and China that continued to do business with Iran, even though these countries were not directly subject to U.S. sanctions.

Key Differences Between Primary and Secondary Sanctions

Understanding the distinctions between primary and secondary sanctions is essential for compliance and risk management. The following sections will highlight the key differences between the two.

1. Target and Applicability

The primary difference between primary and secondary sanctions lies in their scope and application. Primary sanctions target the sanctioned country, its citizens, or businesses directly. They restrict the ability of entities within the imposing country (such as the U.S.) to engage in transactions with the target country or its representatives.

Secondary sanctions, on the other hand, target foreign companies, governments, or entities that engage in prohibited transactions with the sanctioned country. They are extraterritorial in nature, meaning they apply to foreign entities even if they are not directly subject to the laws of the country imposing the sanctions.

2. Enforcement Mechanisms

Primary sanctions are enforced by the government or regulatory body that imposes them, such as the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). U.S. companies and individuals found violating primary sanctions can face severe penalties, including fines, asset freezes, and criminal charges.

Secondary sanctions are enforced through similar channels, but their application involves a more complex web of international actors. For instance, secondary sanctions may be imposed on a foreign company by the U.S. if that company does business with a sanctioned entity or country. The enforcement of secondary sanctions requires collaboration with other governments and global institutions to create an environment where companies around the world feel pressured to comply with U.S. or international sanctions regimes.

3. Impact on Global Trade and Diplomacy

Primary sanctions directly affect global trade by limiting the ability of the sanctioned country to engage in trade or financial transactions with the imposing country. These sanctions can also have indirect effects, such as limiting the access of the sanctioned country’s businesses to international financial markets or restricting their ability to access certain goods or services.

Secondary sanctions, by extending the scope of sanctions to foreign entities, create a more far-reaching impact on global trade and diplomacy. They compel companies and governments from other countries to align with the sanctions or face penalties. This can have a significant effect on international business practices, as companies worldwide may decide to avoid doing business with sanctioned countries to prevent the risk of secondary sanctions.

4. Examples of Primary and Secondary Sanctions in Action

To better illustrate the differences between primary and secondary sanctions, let’s look at some real-world examples.

Primary Sanctions: U.S. Sanctions on Iran

The United States has imposed extensive primary sanctions on Iran over the years, aimed at curbing its nuclear ambitions and limiting its influence in the Middle East. These sanctions have targeted Iranian businesses, banks, and government officials, restricting their ability to access U.S. financial markets or conduct transactions with U.S. entities. The sanctions have been a major factor in limiting Iran’s global trade and economic development.

Secondary Sanctions: U.S. Sanctions on Foreign Companies Doing Business with Iran

In 2018, when the United States withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, it re-imposed primary sanctions on Iran. However, it also extended secondary sanctions to foreign companies that continued to do business with Iran. For instance, European companies that were involved in oil transactions with Iran or had business dealings with Iranian firms were subject to U.S. penalties, including being blocked from accessing U.S. financial markets. This forced many European firms to reconsider their relationships with Iran, even though they were not directly subject to U.S. law.

Secondary Sanctions on China and North Korea

Another example of secondary sanctions involves China and North Korea. The U.S. has imposed sanctions on Chinese companies and individuals involved in business transactions with North Korean entities, which are subject to primary sanctions due to their links to the North Korean regime. Secondary sanctions on Chinese firms have created significant pressure on China to align with U.S. sanctions, despite not being subject to them directly.

Why Understanding Primary and Secondary Sanctions Matters

For compliance professionals, businesses, and financial institutions, understanding the difference between primary and secondary sanctions is essential for managing risks and ensuring compliance. Violating sanctions—whether primary or secondary—can result in severe financial penalties, reputational damage, and even criminal charges. Companies operating internationally need to be aware of the potential risks posed by secondary sanctions and take appropriate steps to mitigate exposure, such as conducting thorough due diligence and monitoring business partners for potential violations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, primary and secondary sanctions are both critical tools in global financial and political strategies, but they serve distinct purposes. Primary sanctions directly target a sanctioned country or its entities, restricting their ability to engage in certain activities, especially financial transactions. Secondary sanctions extend the reach of primary sanctions by targeting foreign entities that do business with the sanctioned country or its representatives.

The global nature of financial markets means that businesses and governments around the world must carefully navigate these sanctions to avoid legal and financial repercussions. Understanding the differences between primary and secondary sanctions is a key step in developing a robust compliance framework that addresses the risks of operating in a complex, interconnected world.

Follow

Understanding Primary Sanctions and Secondary Sanctions: Key Differences Explained

Table of Contents