The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has released a landmark report stating that the rapid evolution of digital finance demands a consistent regulatory approach to prevent the rise of illicit payments across the global economy. This research highlights that the traditional banking sector is no longer the sole focus of financial integrity efforts as stablecoins and central bank digital currencies gain prominence. Authorities are increasingly concerned that the varying levels of intermediation between cash, bank deposits, and cryptoassets could create systemic vulnerabilities if not addressed through harmonized oversight. By analyzing the structural differences in how value is transferred, the report provides a roadmap for policymakers to ensure that innovation does not outpace the ability to detect and prevent financial crime. The shift toward a unified regulatory framework is essential to maintain public trust in both emerging digital currencies and established monetary systems.
Table of Contents
Advancing the Consistent Regulatory Approach for Modern Systems
The transition from physical currency to digital assets has necessitated a fundamental shift in how regulators perceive and mitigate risks within the global economy. Traditionally, anti-money laundering measures relied heavily on regulated entities like banks to act as gatekeepers, identifying customers and monitoring their transactions for suspicious patterns. However, the rise of decentralized technologies and non-intermediated instruments has challenged this model, as these assets can often be transferred without a central authority. The report suggests that a holistic strategy must be adopted, ensuring that similar risks are treated with equivalent regulatory rigor regardless of the underlying technology used for the payment. This approach aims to close gaps that currently exist between the highly regulated banking environment and the rapidly evolving, sometimes opaque, world of virtual assets and self-hosted wallets.
The BIS analysis suggests that the effectiveness of the global financial integrity framework depends on its ability to adapt to the specific technical characteristics of new instruments. For example, while bank deposits are inherently tied to a verified identity, certain cryptoassets can be designed to prioritize anonymity, which complicates the task of law enforcement. To counteract this, the consistent regulatory approach advocates for the implementation of oversight mechanisms that are proportional to the risk of the transaction rather than the type of technology. This ensures that a transfer of value via a stablecoin is subject to the same scrutiny as a traditional wire transfer, provided the risk profiles are comparable. By establishing these baseline expectations, the international community can foster a more resilient financial architecture that discourages regulatory arbitrage.
Evaluating the Intermediation Gap in Global Payment Instruments
One of the most critical challenges identified by the authors is the varying degrees of intermediation present in modern payment systems, which directly impacts the effectiveness of oversight. Bank deposits and e-money are fully intermediated, meaning every transaction passes through a regulated institution that is legally obligated to perform due diligence. In contrast, physical cash is entirely non-intermediated, allowing for peer-to-peer transfers that leave no digital footprint and are virtually impossible to monitor in real time. Cryptoassets occupy a middle ground, where transfers through centralized exchanges are visible, but transactions between self-hosted wallets bypass traditional gatekeepers. To address this, new requirements like the travel rule have been introduced to ensure that identifying information follows digital transfers, effectively creating a digital trail that mirrors the transparency of wire transfers in the traditional banking sector.
Furthermore, the report emphasizes that the degree of intermediation often determines the probability of detecting illicit activity. In a fully intermediated system, the service provider acts as a proactive monitor, identifying red flags before a transaction is even completed. In non-intermediated systems, the burden of detection often falls on ex-post investigations by law enforcement, which are significantly more resource-intensive and less likely to succeed if the trail has gone cold. The consistent regulatory approach seeks to bridge this gap by encouraging the development of technical solutions that can provide visibility into non-intermediated flows without compromising the core benefits of the technology. This might include the use of blockchain analytics or the integration of compliance protocols directly into the software of digital wallets, ensuring that oversight is as automated and seamless as the payments themselves.
Addressing the Waterbed Effect in Financial Crime Prevention
As regulations tighten in one area of the financial system, there is a significant risk that illicit activity will simply migrate to less regulated sectors, a phenomenon known as the waterbed effect. For instance, if banks implement extremely strict monitoring, criminals may pivot toward using high-value cash transactions or unhosted cryptoasset wallets to move funds. To combat this, the report emphasizes the importance of setting limits on cash payments and bringing crypto-service providers into the same regulatory fold as traditional financial institutions. By creating a level playing field, authorities can ensure that no single instrument becomes a preferred haven for money laundering or terrorist financing. This requires a coordinated international effort to align standards across jurisdictions, preventing regulatory arbitrage where malicious actors exploit the weaker laws of specific countries.
The waterbed effect is particularly dangerous in a globalized economy where funds can be moved across borders in milliseconds. If one major financial hub fails to adopt a consistent regulatory approach, it becomes a weak link that can be exploited by international criminal organizations. The report argues that the only way to effectively manage this risk is through the universal adoption of the standards set by the Financial Action Task Force. This includes the rigorous enforcement of customer due diligence and the timely reporting of suspicious transactions. Moreover, the report suggests that authorities must remain vigilant and ready to update their frameworks as new payment methods emerge, ensuring that the regulatory perimeter is always broad enough to capture potential new avenues for financial crime.
Technical Design and the Future of Central Bank Digital Currencies
The introduction of retail central bank digital currencies, such as the proposed digital euro, offers a unique opportunity to build compliance and privacy directly into the technical architecture of money. Unlike commercial bank money, a central bank digital currency can be designed with varying levels of anonymity, potentially allowing for private small-scale transactions while maintaining high visibility for larger transfers. The challenge for central banks lies in finding a balance that respects individual privacy rights while fulfilling the legal mandate to prevent financial crime. The report discusses how tiered access and specific reporting thresholds can be implemented to mirror the characteristics of both cash and digital deposits. By integrating these features at the design stage, policymakers can create a secure and efficient payment instrument that supports the modernization of the financial system without compromising its integrity.
In addition to tiered access, the report highlights the potential for using programmable features within digital currencies to automate compliance. For example, a digital currency could be programmed to automatically flag or block transactions that exceed certain risk thresholds or that involve sanctioned entities. This proactive approach would significantly reduce the reliance on manual monitoring and could lead to more accurate and timely interventions. However, the implementation of such features must be handled with care to ensure they do not infringe on the legitimate use of the currency or create unnecessary friction for users. The consistent regulatory approach provides a framework for evaluating these trade-offs, ensuring that the design of new digital currencies is guided by the dual principles of efficiency and integrity.
Key Points
- The Bank for International Settlements emphasizes the need for a consistent regulatory approach that applies equivalent rules to cash, bank deposits, and cryptoassets.
- Regulators must address the lack of intermediation in self-hosted wallets and cash to prevent these instruments from being exploited for illicit activities.
- The waterbed effect remains a primary concern, as tightening rules in one sector may push criminal activity toward less monitored financial channels.
- Technical design in central bank digital currencies can allow for a balance between transactional privacy and the necessity of anti-money laundering oversight.
- The shift toward a single rulebook in Europe is a strategic move to eliminate jurisdictional loopholes and harmonize financial integrity standards across the continent.
Related Links
- FATF Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and VASPs
- European Parliament Regulation on Information Accompanying Transfers of Cryptoassets
- European Commission Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Package
- Financial Stability Board Recommendations for the Regulation of Global Stablecoin Arrangements
Other FinCrime Central Articles About the Need For Payment Regulation
- The European Payments Council Advances Central Fraud Information Sharing
- Inside FATF’s Revised R.16 That Redefines AML Compliance for Payments
- Cross-Border Payments AML Challenges In A Rapidly Evolving Financial World
Source: BIS, by Andrea Minto, Anneke Kosse, Takeshi Shirakami and Peter Wierts
Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.
Want to promote your brand with us or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.
