Across Africa, a wave of regulatory introspection and reform is reshaping the continent’s response to money laundering and terrorism financing. Ghana and Botswana, two countries often cited as models of financial governance, have in recent months unveiled bold and pragmatic measures aimed at closing systemic loopholes that enable illicit financial flows. While Ghana’s central bank has rolled out a new set of comprehensive AML/CFT guidelines to reinforce compliance and risk-based supervision, Botswana’s leadership has called for a moral and institutional reckoning that goes beyond regulation to address the culture of corruption and complacency that often fuels financial crime.

Strengthening AML/CFT frameworks in Africa

The Bank of Ghana’s September 2025 AML/CFT/Proliferation Financing Guideline marked a significant turning point. It demanded deeper due diligence, broader beneficial ownership transparency, and enhanced board-level accountability for anti-money laundering compliance. This framework explicitly targets the misuse of banks, microfinance institutions, and non-bank financial entities as conduits for illicit transactions. The Ghanaian regulator’s emphasis on a “risk-based approach” reflects a shift away from compliance checklists toward the active identification and mitigation of exposure to terrorism financing networks, trade-based laundering, and proliferation risks linked to dual-use goods.

Ghana’s central bank placed particular focus on politically exposed persons, a segment often linked to abuse of office and hidden offshore structures. Institutions are now obliged to apply enhanced scrutiny on accounts associated with public officials, their families, and close associates. The Financial Intelligence Centre has been tasked with ensuring timely suspicious transaction reporting, while internal compliance officers are expected to maintain ongoing monitoring and training across every level of the organization. The move is not only a regulatory alignment with international benchmarks but also a strategic step toward Ghana’s upcoming Financial Action Task Force (FATF) peer evaluation, which will assess the effectiveness of its financial integrity systems rather than their mere existence.

In parallel, Botswana hosted the 2025 High-Level Africa Civil Society AML/CFT Conference in Gaborone, where President Duma Boko issued a stark challenge to African governments and civil society: look inward before pointing fingers. His message cut through bureaucratic rhetoric. Money laundering, he said, thrives not because of weak laws but because of moral weakness and a tolerance for impunity. By advocating “self-examination,” President Boko reframed the fight against financial crime as a civic and ethical project, not just a technical exercise. His speech emphasized that anti-money laundering regimes fail when those entrusted with public trust exploit regulatory gaps for personal enrichment.

Both countries’ approaches represent different but complementary dimensions of the same problem. Ghana’s blueprint embodies institutional rigor and procedural modernization, while Botswana’s reform narrative emphasizes integrity, inclusion, and the human element in financial governance. Together, they illustrate a continental awakening—a recognition that the erosion of financial transparency also erodes democracy, investor confidence, and long-term growth.

Governance, civic accountability, and the human cost of illicit finance

The Gaborone conference offered an unfiltered look into the complex interplay between financial regulation and civic freedoms. Over 200 delegates from 54 African nations gathered to deliberate on the theme “Placing Civic Space at the Heart of Combating Money Laundering and Countering Terrorism Financing.” The discussions underscored a growing concern: that AML/CFT laws, while essential, are sometimes misused to constrain non-profit organizations under the pretext of security.

Civil society leaders warned that some African jurisdictions weaponize compliance rules against advocacy groups, restricting funding and operations under suspicion of terrorism financing. This misuse distorts the spirit of FATF Recommendation 8, which was designed to protect non-profit entities from abuse, not punish legitimate ones. By contrast, Botswana’s government, through its Minister of Labour and Home Affairs, announced the country’s substantial compliance with Recommendation 8 after years of deficiency. This achievement, they explained, stemmed from moving “from regulation that restricts to regulation that empowers.”

Beyond compliance, the minister revealed the establishment of the Institute for Combating Illicit Financial Crimes at the University of Botswana and a national dialogue platform bridging government and civic actors. These initiatives aim to ensure that financial integrity reforms are participatory and inclusive, minimizing the risk that laws meant to fight terrorism financing inadvertently suppress human rights.

The conference’s tone contrasted technical expertise with human consequences. Speakers repeatedly tied money laundering to organized crime, corruption, and social decay. The link was clear: illicit funds siphoned from public projects mean fewer schools, weaker healthcare systems, and eroded public trust. The invisible victims of money laundering are ordinary citizens whose opportunities are stolen by those laundering political or criminal proceeds.

From the financial sector’s perspective, Ghana’s strengthened framework answers a different set of risks. The misuse of digital banking platforms, remittance systems, and cross-border payment corridors has been flagged as a major vulnerability. By mandating that financial institutions adopt technology-driven monitoring systems, the Bank of Ghana seeks to detect unusual patterns early. The use of artificial intelligence in transaction monitoring, the verification of beneficial ownership data, and the integration of compliance training into executive accountability all signal a shift toward a data-centric regime. These developments matter not only for Ghana’s financial integrity but also for West Africa’s collective standing in FATF evaluations.

Botswana’s leadership, on the other hand, reminded the continent that data and technology alone cannot repair moral decay. President Boko’s repeated emphasis on courage and self-scrutiny resonated with an audience weary of surface-level reforms. He urged African leaders to dismantle entrenched patronage systems and ensure that AML laws are enforced without fear or favoritism. His remarks pointed to a fundamental truth: illicit financial flows are not just economic anomalies but moral failures that corrode state legitimacy.

Regional convergence and the road toward FATF compliance

Both Ghana and Botswana are acutely aware of the consequences of failing to meet FATF standards. Ghana’s efforts reflect lessons learned from its previous listing concerns, while Botswana’s history of partial compliance has shaped a national determination to institutionalize reform. The minister’s announcement that Botswana achieved substantial compliance with FATF’s Recommendation 8 is not just a bureaucratic milestone; it signals a shift in governance philosophy from reactive enforcement to proactive partnership.

This trend aligns with a broader regional trajectory. Across the continent, regulators are recalibrating their AML/CFT regimes to prioritize effectiveness. Ghana’s central bank explicitly links its guideline to FATF’s risk-based methodology, which requires countries to focus their resources on the areas of highest threat. Meanwhile, Botswana’s civic engagement model complements this by integrating community oversight into the national risk architecture. When civil society organizations participate in monitoring and reporting, the entire ecosystem becomes more transparent and resilient.

The synergy between institutional reform and civic accountability may represent Africa’s most promising route to sustainable financial integrity. Yet, the challenges remain formidable. Informal economies, limited supervisory capacity, and political interference continue to undermine implementation. The conference in Gaborone highlighted the tension between state security interests and civil liberties, particularly as governments tighten controls over cross-border transactions to curb terrorism financing.

The reality is that terrorism financing in Africa has evolved. Non-state actors increasingly exploit digital wallets, crypto assets, and cross-border hawala systems to fund operations. Both Ghana’s updated framework and Botswana’s civic-based approach attempt to address this shift by enhancing due diligence and transparency across all sectors, including non-profit organizations and financial intermediaries. Ghana’s inclusion of proliferation financing risk underscores its awareness of emerging threats, especially the illicit trade in dual-use goods and precursor materials.

Crucially, both countries are demonstrating that compliance is not an endpoint but a continuous process. The Bank of Ghana’s guideline requires ongoing staff training and internal audits, while Botswana’s national mechanism fosters dialogue between regulators and the regulated. This convergence of hard rules and soft governance may prove to be the continent’s defining strategy in the next FATF evaluation cycle.

Building a culture of integrity beyond compliance

The renewed momentum in Ghana and Botswana represents a deeper transformation: the movement from technical compliance to cultural integrity. The traditional approach to anti-money laundering in Africa has often been reactive—driven by fear of blacklisting or loss of correspondent banking relationships. The new paradigm emerging from Accra and Gaborone is proactive, grounded in ethics and collaboration.

A culture of integrity cannot be legislated into existence. It requires visible leadership, credible enforcement, and social participation. Botswana’s call for self-examination echoes the need for introspection within government institutions and the private sector alike. Financial crime thrives in opacity, but transparency without accountability achieves little. President Boko’s insistence that societies must “welcome scrutiny rather than fear it” captures the essence of what effective AML governance entails: courage, openness, and public trust.

For financial institutions, this means moving beyond the bare minimum of customer due diligence and reporting thresholds. It involves using advanced analytics to identify structural risks, investing in compliance culture, and recognizing that ethical governance is a business advantage, not a regulatory burden. Ghana’s directive that boards and senior management assume explicit responsibility for AML oversight ensures that accountability sits at the top. No longer can compliance be delegated to middle management or outsourced to consultants.

For regulators, the path forward involves balancing enforcement with education. Botswana’s collaboration with academic institutions such as the University of Botswana to create a dedicated institute for combating illicit finance exemplifies how knowledge-sharing strengthens long-term resilience. Ghana’s Financial Intelligence Centre’s increased mandate to coordinate with international partners similarly demonstrates a maturing understanding that financial crime is borderless and requires cooperation beyond domestic law.

Ultimately, both nations are reframing the narrative: from compliance for compliance’s sake to a shared mission of integrity. The financial crime landscape is adapting rapidly, and Africa’s success will depend on whether these early reforms translate into sustained action and measurable impact. The next few years will test whether Ghana’s financial institutions can embed risk-based compliance into daily operations and whether Botswana’s civic engagement model can withstand political pressures.

---

Related Links

• Bank of Ghana official publications
• Financial Intelligence Centre Ghana
• Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
• Ministry of Finance Botswana
• Inter-Governmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA)

Other FinCrime Central Articles About Africa’s Fight Against Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing

• Four Countries Exit the FATF Grey List While Many Others Stay Under Watch
• Africa’s Coordinated Crackdown Exposes Terrorism Financing Web
• A Consolidated View from FATF Follow-Up AML Reports on West Africa

Source:

• Modern Ghana, by Joseph Kobla Wemakor
• Citi Newsroom, by Emmanuel Oppong

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.

Want to promote your brand, or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.