An exclusive article by Fred Kahn

Japan’s financial sector is preparing for a major transformation as new regulations set to take effect in 2027 will require banks and credit card companies to use IC chip-based customer verification for remote account openings. This bold move is more than a local regulatory update; it represents a significant global trend toward securing identity verification through hardware-backed digital credentials rather than scanned documents or visual checks. Understanding this shift is vital for compliance professionals, regulators, and technology vendors as it will influence anti-money laundering (AML) efforts, fraud prevention, and customer onboarding standards worldwide.

IC Chip Identity Verification – Japan’s Approach and Rationale

Japan’s decision to mandate IC chip identity verification is the result of evolving challenges in the country’s financial system and a response to increasingly sophisticated fraud. The National Police Agency and the Financial Services Agency have documented a sharp rise in identity theft cases tied to falsified or doctored document scans, which are often used to open accounts at banks, securities firms, and credit card issuers.

Under current Japanese law, particularly the Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds (Act No. 22 of 2007), financial institutions are required to perform strict customer due diligence when onboarding new clients. Traditional KYC methods involve checking the My Number Card, driver’s license, or other approved documents. While digital uploads and facial recognition technology have improved convenience, the reliance on static document images or photographs leaves institutions vulnerable to manipulation and fraud.

IC chip identity verification provides a powerful answer to these risks. Japan’s “My Number” card, the nation’s official identification credential, has been embedded with an encrypted IC chip since 2021. By mandating that financial institutions leverage this secure, tamper-resistant chip for onboarding, Japan is raising the bar for what constitutes robust customer verification. The encrypted data on the chip can only be accessed by authorized card readers or certified mobile devices, making fraudulent account creation dramatically more difficult.

The law’s implementation will begin in April 2027, but the announcement has already prompted banks and fintechs to reexamine their customer onboarding journeys and invest in new digital infrastructure. The policy is a concrete example of how regulation, technology, and national security concerns intersect in the ongoing fight against financial crime.

The Global Shift: Moving from Document-Based KYC to Chip-Based Digital Identity

Japan’s IC chip initiative is not occurring in isolation. Across the world, regulators and banks are confronting the limits of document-based identity verification. Criminals have become adept at fabricating documents, manipulating photographs, or even deepfaking facial recognition systems. This has driven the need for “strong” digital identity: credentials that combine something the user has (like a chip card or token) with secure cryptographic features.

The European Union’s eIDAS Regulation and the planned EU Digital Identity Wallet are examples of similar shifts. These frameworks promote the use of hardware-backed digital credentials and encourage the adoption of government-issued eIDs with chip technology. Estonia, for example, requires residents to use smart ID cards for a wide range of financial and government transactions, relying on chip data that cannot be replicated with ordinary photographs or PDFs.

The United States is also exploring next-generation identity frameworks, with state-issued driver’s licenses beginning to feature NFC-enabled chips and several states piloting mobile driver’s licenses that use device-level security to verify identities. Singapore’s Singpass system offers another regional example of integrated digital identity, with an emphasis on cryptographically secure authentication methods.

What sets Japan’s approach apart is the mandatory requirement for chip-based verification in the financial sector, especially for remote onboarding. This policy sets a new standard for compliance, fraud prevention, and customer trust.

IC Chip Identity Verification: Benefits and Challenges for AML Compliance

The shift to IC chip identity verification brings tangible advantages to AML compliance, but it also introduces new complexities for banks and their customers.

Benefits:

• Stronger Authentication: IC chips offer end-to-end encryption and anti-tampering protections, making them extremely difficult to forge. Data stored in the chip is cryptographically signed, allowing institutions to verify authenticity without relying on visual checks or human intervention.
• Reduction in Fraud: With chip verification, cases of account opening using synthetic or stolen identities drop sharply. Criminals would need to physically possess a legitimate IC card and bypass hardware-level protections, an extremely high barrier compared to manipulating document scans.
• Improved Data Privacy: Banks can read only the necessary data fields from the chip, reducing the risk of excessive data collection and enhancing compliance with privacy laws such as Japan’s Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) and, globally, the EU’s GDPR.
• Enhanced Customer Experience: Once the infrastructure is in place, IC chip verification can be faster and more convenient than repeated manual uploads or video calls, especially if mobile devices can act as certified readers.

Challenges:

• Hardware and Integration Costs: Banks must invest in new readers, secure mobile apps, and backend integration to read and process chip data. Smaller institutions may face budgetary and logistical hurdles.
• Customer Accessibility: Not all customers may possess the latest My Number card or compatible smartphones. Special attention will be needed for elderly, rural, or tech-averse populations.
• Regulatory Coordination: As financial services grow more global, ensuring that chip-based verification meets cross-border regulatory requirements remains an evolving challenge. Alignment with FATF recommendations and interoperability with other countries’ eID frameworks will be essential.
• Theft: Although IC chips are more secure than paper IDs, the risk of physical theft of cards persists. Stolen cards, if paired with social engineering or weak PIN/password protections, may still be used for unauthorized account access.
• Forgery: Sophisticated criminal groups may attempt to clone or forge IC chip cards. While chip encryption provides a robust defense, determined actors will continue to explore technological loopholes, making ongoing vigilance and technological updates necessary.

From an AML perspective, the most significant advantage is the dramatic reduction in onboarding fraud risk. Since financial institutions must identify and verify customers in accordance with laws like the Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds, IC chip-based KYC provides a level of assurance unattainable with scanned documents.

From an AML perspective, the most significant advantage is the dramatic reduction in onboarding fraud risk. Since financial institutions must identify and verify customers in accordance with laws like the Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds, IC chip-based KYC provides a level of assurance unattainable with scanned documents.

Lessons for the Future: How the Move to Chips Impacts AML, KYC, and Financial Crime Prevention

Japan’s policy shift will likely accelerate global conversations about the future of digital identity and financial crime compliance. Several trends and best practices emerge for banks, fintechs, and regulators worldwide:

• Embrace Hardware-Based Security: Software-only solutions can be compromised by malware or social engineering. Hardware-based chips offer stronger guarantees, especially for remote onboarding and high-risk transactions.
• Interoperability Is Key: As customers increasingly interact with banks and fintechs across borders, standards for digital identity (such as those promoted by ISO/IEC 7816 for IC cards) and international regulatory alignment will become more critical.
• Customer Education: Introducing chip-based verification will require public information campaigns, help desks, and simple guides to ensure all segments of the population can access financial services.
• Continuous Innovation: Criminals will continue to look for new vulnerabilities. Institutions must update their onboarding processes, authentication protocols, and fraud detection methods in line with the latest security advancements.
• Policy Harmonization: Regulatory bodies should cooperate to harmonize technical requirements, legal definitions, and acceptable identity credentials for AML compliance. This is vital for cross-border transactions and global financial crime prevention.

Countries considering similar measures can draw lessons from Japan’s proactive regulatory approach, as well as from Estonia, Singapore, and the EU. The long-term result could be a global ecosystem where secure, interoperable, and privacy-respecting digital identities are the norm for financial services.

Conclusion: IC Chip Identity Verification and the Next Evolution in Global Compliance

Japan’s decision to mandate IC chip identity verification in banking marks a pivotal shift in the global fight against financial crime. By requiring strong, hardware-backed digital credentials, Japan’s regulators are setting a new benchmark for KYC, customer onboarding, and AML compliance.

As other jurisdictions grapple with document fraud, identity theft, and synthetic identities, Japan’s approach may serve as a model for integrating technology, regulation, and user experience. The shift from documents to chips is not merely a technological upgrade; it is a fundamental change in the way trust is established in the financial system.

Banks, fintechs, and compliance professionals worldwide should monitor this development closely. Whether through national ID cards, mobile identity wallets, or emerging blockchain-based credentials, the journey toward stronger digital identity is accelerating. Those who adapt will not only meet regulatory expectations but also gain a competitive edge in the evolving financial landscape.

---

Related Links

• Japan Financial Services Agency: AML/CFT Guidelines
• Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds (English translation)
• Japan National Police Agency: Fraud and Financial Crime Data
• European Union eIDAS Regulation
• ISO/IEC 7816 – International Standard for IC Cards

Other FinCrime Central Articles About Ways to Improve Identity Verification

• The Need for Consortium Validation in the Age of Fraud-as-a-Service
• Understanding Biometric Vulnerabilities: How Presentation Attacks Threaten Security
• In the Shoes of a Money Launderer: 11 Techniques to Open Bank Accounts Anonymously

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.

Want to promote your brand with us or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.