Money Laundering Network Exposed in €520 Million Moby Dick VAT Fraud Scheme

vat fraud money laundering organized crime italy eppo

This image is AI-generated.

Money laundering stands as the pivotal crime at the center of the so-called Moby Dick VAT fraud case, one of the largest cross-border financial crime crackdowns in recent European history. Italian and European enforcement agencies, with the lead taken by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), have unraveled a vast network that allegedly moved, concealed, and cleaned hundreds of millions of euros. This case demonstrates how organized crime has adapted advanced money laundering techniques to exploit weaknesses in the European VAT system, underscoring the critical need for robust compliance, coordinated enforcement, and effective anti-money laundering (AML) controls.

The Moby Dick operation brought together law enforcement bodies from more than ten countries. The investigation revealed a sophisticated syndicate using carousel fraud structures and leveraging criminal alliances with notorious mafia clans, particularly the Camorra’s Nuvoletta and Di Lauro groups. At the heart of this activity was an elaborate laundering process, transforming illicit proceeds from fraudulent VAT refunds into seemingly legitimate assets through layers of front companies, asset purchases, and cross-border shell structures. The sums involved—over €520 million in frozen assets and €1.3 billion in suspect trade activity—highlight both the threat and scale of professionalized money laundering in the EU.

Money Laundering Techniques and Organizational Structure

Criminal networks like those behind the Moby Dick scheme rely on advanced methods to disguise illegal proceeds, and this case showcases several textbook money laundering strategies. The network made extensive use of layering, a classic AML red flag. Illicit profits were distributed across numerous front companies, including more than 400 entities investigated for their role in the operation. These companies, often registered in multiple EU states and in offshore jurisdictions with opaque beneficial ownership rules, issued a series of fraudulent invoices for electronics—including high-demand products like laptops and wireless earbuds.

Carousel fraud, or missing trader intra-community (MTIC) fraud, provided the initial illicit funds. The syndicate exploited the EU’s VAT rules for cross-border trade by moving goods through a chain of shell entities, systematically generating false VAT refund claims and creating complex transaction trails. Once these refunds were secured, the proceeds entered the laundering stage. Funds were routed through numerous layers of domestic and foreign bank accounts, leveraging the banking system’s weakest points for monitoring cross-jurisdictional wire transfers and large-value transactions.

Physical asset acquisition was another key laundering tool. Italian authorities have seized nearly two hundred real estate properties, dozens of luxury vehicles, and high-value pleasure boats, all believed to be financed by criminal proceeds. These tangible assets not only store value but can also serve as further vehicles for integrating illicit funds into the legitimate economy, sometimes through resale, rental, or even reinvestment in new criminal ventures. Italian financial investigators also identified attempts to move funds through crypto exchanges, an emerging trend in European money laundering cases, although this aspect remains under further review by regulators.

Legal Frameworks and Enforcement: How the Crackdown Was Achieved

Tackling transnational money laundering networks of this complexity would not have been possible without strengthened European legal and enforcement tools. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office, empowered by Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, was central to coordinating the Moby Dick investigation. The EPPO operates independently but works alongside Eurojust and Europol, pooling resources and intelligence across borders. This cooperation is mandated by the EU’s Directive (EU) 2018/1673 on combating money laundering by criminal law, which requires Member States to criminalize laundering and harmonize penalties.

Italy’s Guardia di Finanza and State Police conducted the frontline investigative and enforcement actions, issuing and executing eleven arrest warrants in the June 2025 wave. Previous phases saw dozens more suspects apprehended in multiple countries, and further asset freezes have been coordinated through judicial cooperation channels. The European Union’s focus on tracing and seizing assets is supported by Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 on the mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders, ensuring that the proceeds of crime can be restrained and recovered wherever found in the EU.

The Moby Dick case also highlights the growing role of targeted financial intelligence in AML/CFT enforcement. Transaction monitoring, beneficial ownership registries, and bank reporting obligations under the EU’s Sixth AML Directive (Directive (EU) 2018/1673) played a significant role in identifying suspicious flows and linking them to the underlying fraud. Italian prosecutors were able to map out shell company relationships, link suspect assets to criminal proceeds, and bring together a cross-jurisdictional picture of money movements that would have been impossible for any single agency to achieve alone.

The Impact on AML/Compliance Practice and European Policy

Cases like Moby Dick deliver both lessons and urgent warnings to the AML compliance community. The operational playbook used by the syndicate is not unique, and many of the vulnerabilities exploited—such as lax oversight of cross-border VAT refunds, weaknesses in beneficial ownership transparency, and insufficient monitoring of high-value asset purchases—remain active risks in much of the European financial system. For compliance professionals, this case underscores the necessity of robust customer due diligence (CDD), ongoing transaction monitoring, and the integration of public and private intelligence sources.

The freezing of more than €520 million in bank accounts and assets reflects the increasing use of financial sanctions as an AML tool. Regulators across Europe are also expanding the obligations for reporting suspicious transactions, with enhanced expectations for financial institutions to detect complex layering and identify links to organized crime. Risk-based approaches, as required by the EU’s AMLD6 and FATF Recommendations, are now seen as essential for proactively managing the threat of cross-border money laundering. The Moby Dick investigation has prompted further policy discussions on harmonizing reporting thresholds, closing loopholes in the VAT system, and increasing cooperation on beneficial ownership data.

Asset forfeiture is another area of focus. Seizures of properties, luxury cars, and vessels are designed to hit criminal organizations where it hurts—removing the fruits of illicit activity and dismantling the infrastructure that supports further crime. These actions are accompanied by ongoing criminal prosecutions, with 195 individuals and over 400 companies under current investigation. The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty, as required by European and Italian law, but the breadth of evidence and the scale of asset recovery reflect an unprecedented enforcement effort.

The Moby Dick network also demonstrates how organized crime adapts to regulatory and technological changes. With the growing use of crypto assets for value transfer and laundering, compliance teams must expand their AML controls to address new risk typologies, including virtual asset service providers, decentralized finance platforms, and international money mules. National financial intelligence units (FIUs) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have been issuing updated guidelines and typology reports in response to these emerging threats.

Conclusion: Lessons from the Moby Dick Money Laundering Operation

The exposure and dismantling of the money laundering operation at the heart of the Moby Dick VAT fraud case set a new benchmark for European AML enforcement. Through coordinated action, legal innovation, and cross-border intelligence sharing, European and Italian authorities have frozen over half a billion euros in assets and uncovered a vast network linking white-collar crime with organized mafia groups. The case underscores the persistent vulnerabilities of the EU’s cross-border VAT regime, as well as the adaptability of criminal enterprises that seek to exploit them.

For the AML and compliance community, Moby Dick offers a timely reminder that professional money laundering remains a major threat to the integrity of the European financial system. Effective prevention requires strong legal frameworks, comprehensive due diligence, and constant vigilance against evolving typologies of financial crime. As EU policymakers debate the next steps for AML harmonization and VAT reform, the lessons from Moby Dick will remain central to the future of European financial crime prevention.

Source: EPPO and OCCRP

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.

Want to promote your brand with us or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.