Money laundering remains the hidden enabler behind most financial crime. Without the ability to disguise illicit proceeds and integrate them back into the financial system, fraud networks and organized crime groups would quickly lose momentum. Operation HAECHI VI, coordinated by INTERPOL between April and August 2025, offers one of the most detailed contemporary case studies of how money laundering interacts with cyber-enabled financial crime. More than 40 countries collaborated, recovering USD 342 million in government-backed currencies and USD 97 million in physical and digital assets. The operation exposed how transnational networks relied on laundering channels to sustain activities ranging from illegal gambling to business email compromise, romance scams, and voice phishing.

Money laundering through cyber-enabled crime

The laundering techniques uncovered were diverse, but all shared one common trait: criminals adapted to the digital environment. Cryptocurrency wallets, electronic banking platforms, offshore accounts, and digital identity fraud created a fluid infrastructure for moving stolen money. Investigators froze nearly 400 cryptocurrency wallets and blocked over 68,000 bank accounts, illustrating both the scale of laundering and the vulnerabilities in existing oversight mechanisms. For compliance professionals, the operation demonstrates how fraud and laundering are now inseparable and must be treated as part of one risk continuum.

Laundering mechanisms behind specific cases

The details emerging from participating jurisdictions show the breadth of laundering typologies. In Portugal, criminals created interconnected groups to divert social security payments destined for vulnerable families. They altered bank account details within government systems and funneled the EUR 228,000 stolen from 531 victims through layers of local and cross-border accounts. This method demonstrates a shift from opportunistic fraud to structured laundering networks designed to obscure origin and ownership.

In Thailand, a transnational gang involving Thai and West African nationals used a business email compromise scam against a Japanese corporation. The USD 6.6 million stolen was initially routed through shell accounts in Bangkok, with laundering intended to cycle the money into seemingly legitimate trading companies. Swift intervention prevented layering, but the structure revealed a model increasingly adopted by hybrid groups combining fraud expertise with laundering professionals.

The Korean National Police, working with Emirati authorities, intercepted USD 3.91 million from a steel company that had been deceived into wiring funds to Dubai. The criminals attempted to exploit forged shipping documents to justify the transfer, demonstrating how trade-based laundering concepts are increasingly linked to cyber-fraud schemes. Authorities prevented the integration stage, but the case showed how financial institutions in multiple regions remain susceptible to fraudsters using trade documentation as a cover for illicit transfers.

Philippine offshore gaming operators (POGOs) emerged once again as a channel for laundering fraud proceeds. Investigations linked online gambling platforms to illicit transfers disguised as gaming revenues. Criminals laundered profits through betting accounts, cash-out services, and digital wallets tied to unregulated operators. This remains a persistent concern across Asia, with laundering risks magnified by cross-border gaming flows and gaps in supervisory coverage.

Cases in Macao, Malaysia, and Brazil added further dimensions. In Macao, criminals used impersonation scams on digital payment platforms and relied on a chain of accounts to disguise movements of funds before cashing out through local operators. Malaysian police seized dozens of laptops and SIM cards connected to a syndicate moving money through a mixture of online fraud and remittance channels. Brazilian authorities uncovered electronic banking fraud networks routing illicit funds through straw accounts, then layering them across fintech wallets to avoid detection. These diverse examples show how the laundering stage is never incidental but central to the business model of organized financial crime.

Enforcement strategies and global cooperation

Operation HAECHI VI highlights how law enforcement has strengthened recovery tools by embedding anti-money laundering principles into cybercrime investigations. The I-GRIP mechanism, developed by INTERPOL in 2022, provided a rapid stop-payment channel between jurisdictions. Unlike traditional asset recovery procedures that often take months, I-GRIP allowed stolen funds to be intercepted in real time, a critical feature when laundering involves instantaneous transfers across continents.

This approach reflects a recognition that financial crime investigations can no longer be siloed. Law enforcement officers must combine AML expertise with cyber-forensic skills, while financial institutions must provide responsive intelligence on suspicious transfers. The freezing of 400 cryptocurrency wallets shows how partnerships between regulators, exchanges, and investigators can disrupt laundering that once seemed untouchable.

The operation also demonstrates the role of multi-jurisdictional intelligence sharing. By involving countries as diverse as Brazil, Germany, Ghana, and the United States, INTERPOL leveraged a cooperative framework that enabled investigators to trace laundering chains cutting across banking, gaming, and crypto platforms. While no single jurisdiction can fully police digital laundering channels, joint operations show that global disruption is possible when information flows are rapid and aligned with AML red-flag indicators.

For many of the countries involved, this operation was not just about asset recovery but also capacity building. Investigators from emerging economies gained exposure to international cooperation mechanisms, while advanced financial centers benefited from intelligence about laundering practices in less regulated jurisdictions. The blending of experience improved the collective ability to identify typologies, set red flags, and close regulatory loopholes exploited by criminals.

Broader implications for compliance frameworks

The cases revealed by HAECHI VI should resonate with compliance teams worldwide. Fraud typologies such as romance scams or investment fraud often appear to be outside the direct responsibility of AML frameworks, but the laundering of the proceeds inevitably touches banks, payment providers, and crypto platforms. Financial institutions must therefore adapt monitoring systems to detect red flags associated with cyber-enabled laundering. These include unusual account openings linked to gaming revenues, multiple small transfers to cryptocurrency exchanges, and rapid outbound wires with forged trade documents.

Supervisory authorities are also under pressure to tighten oversight of sectors repeatedly linked to laundering. Philippine offshore gaming, unregulated online trading platforms, and loosely monitored e-commerce intermediaries create systemic vulnerabilities. Operation HAECHI VI illustrates that these vulnerabilities are being exploited at a scale measured in hundreds of millions of dollars. Regulators in Europe, Asia, and Latin America may draw lessons from the cooperative mechanisms applied here, particularly the integration of AML recovery tools into cross-border fraud response frameworks.

For compliance professionals, the takeaway is that anti-fraud and AML programs must converge. Separating the two creates blind spots where criminals can hide. The multi-jurisdictional seizures and recoveries show that institutions with robust transaction monitoring and rapid escalation channels can play a decisive role in intercepting illicit flows. The broader fight against money laundering now depends on the ability of banks, fintechs, and regulators to work as one networked ecosystem, just as criminals do.

Financial institutions should also prepare for increased supervisory scrutiny following high-profile operations of this scale. Regulators are likely to demand more evidence that firms can prevent, detect, and report laundering linked to cyber-enabled fraud. This means refining risk assessments, enhancing staff training, and upgrading monitoring systems to cover evolving typologies. For global AML practitioners, HAECHI VI represents a warning and an opportunity: criminals are expanding their laundering networks, but international coordination is proving more effective at intercepting them.

---

Related Links

• INTERPOL Financial Crime and Anti-Corruption Centre
• Financial Action Task Force
• European Banking Authority AML resources
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Other FinCrime Central News About Interpol

• The Interpol-Africa Collaboration Is a Major Step in Transforming Financial Security
• Interpol Silver Notice: A New Tool to Combat Organized Crime
• Interpol I-GRIP: A Growing Demand from Countries to Combat Financial Crime

Source: Interpol

Some of FinCrime Central’s articles may have been enriched or edited with the help of AI tools. It may contain unintentional errors.

Want to promote your brand, or need some help selecting the right solution or the right advisory firm? Email us at info@fincrimecentral.com; we probably have the right contact for you.